My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01a
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
101607
>
01a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2007 2:17:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2007 2:17:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
funding and to direct staff to do calculations for GASB45 for 2008 even though it was not <br />required by law. <br />Judy Symcox said CaIPERS has a current unfunded liability of $26 billion and felt the City <br />would be better off on its own, did not feel the item was not noticed well and was last <br />discussed late in the evening, voiced concerns of transparency, referred to overtime costs, <br />retiree medical and contribution into PERS and felt the cost annually per employee would <br />be over $198,000. <br />Kay Ayala opposed to the excessive medical and retirement benefits compared to the <br />private sector, quoted Professor Alexander Tyler and felt it behooves elected officials to <br />turn back what was changed in 2000 as the City could not fiscally sustain the benefits <br />given to the unions. <br />Karen Martens disagreed that the City could not afford to pay increased benefits, agreed <br />benefits were expensive, thanked the Council for standing behind the matter, felt there <br />was sufficient time for people to have obtained information at the first reading and was <br />concerned that the Livermore/Pleasanton Fire Department employees might get the idea <br />that the public does not think they are worth the amount of money put forth. <br />Councilmember McGovern noted all issues being discussed had been negotiated, felt the <br />City was looking at its long-term liability to determine how to ensure people are paid over <br />time, felt there was collaboration in bringing the liability more into line for the City but did <br />not feel it was one-sided. <br />Mayor Hosterman said the COLA was 4.5%, felt firefighters risk their lives everyday, <br />wanted firefighters well-trained, well-paid, and for them to be able to continue to do their <br />jobs. <br />Councilmember McGovern concurred with Mr. Brozosky's comments and the idea of <br />putting the ARC at a level to keep up with whatever the City owes but questioned how this <br />could be done. City Manager Fialho said this could be reflected in the motion and staff <br />would include the statement in the June 2008 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report <br />which is submitted to the Council at the end of the fiscal year. He said in the next two-year <br />operating budget, with the exception of Fire, staff has put aside the ARC. On the LPFD <br />side, this was not done because of need to work with Livermore to determine the amount. <br />Councilmember Thorne agreed that private sector employee benefits were very different, <br />but felt the City had put more things into place that made the MOU structured more like a <br />private sector program. <br />Councilmember Sullivan questioned when details of the trust would be reviewed. City <br />Manager Fialho said the details in terms of the establishment of the trust will not occur <br />until 2009 but the mechanics of how the City accounts for its liability and puts aside the <br />annual contribution will be reflected in the 2008 report. Councilmember Sullivan said this <br />was a collective bargaining agreement between the employees and employer, which he <br />felt was democracy in the workplace and a right to be maintained. He felt what the City did <br />with the firefighters was a good process and it should be celebrated. Regarding <br />transparency issues, he said there is a JPA committee comprised of two representatives <br />of each Council. The concepts and framework of the negotiations and strategies are <br />agreed to by that JPA committee in advance, for which two public meetings have been <br />City Council Minutes 6 September 4, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.