01a - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember Sullivan confirmed that the 47 units are required under State law. He said the General Plan policy discussed in the Land Use Element that talked about units being moved toward areas of either affordable or TOD, and since this has not been adopted, it does not apply; however, Mr. Iserson said the principle still applied. If the holding capacity is not approved on this site, by State Law, the City needs to find another location to accommodate those. He said a number of sites have been identified as receiver sites if the Council feels the plans are otherwise acceptable and approvable. City Manager Fialho said staff identified 20 units which must meet the affordable housing needs for the City; however, beyond that, the Council has the ability to determine where the placement of those units should go and to what degree they should provide housing for in this community. Councilmember Sullivan confirmed there were no entitlement that those 47 units would be built. Councilmember McGovern referred to the East Bay Regional Parks letter and questioned whether they believe the project goes along with the City's General Plan, quoting under Land Use, Policy 12: "Preserve scenic ridges and views of Pleasanton main and southeast hills ridges." Conservation and Open Space: "Protect all large contiguous areas of open space as designated on the General Plan from intrusion by urban development." Conservation and Open Space, Policy 5: "Preserve as permanent open space all areas of outstanding scenic quality or areas that provide extraordinary views of natural and man- made objects." Conservation and Open Space Element 4.4: "Preserve large blocks of open space land by encouraging the clustering of development." Mr. Iserson said as staff went through the various policies that affect the site, on balance, the vast majority were satisfied with what the project was proposing. Councilmember McGovern referred to the Native Plant Society who indicates, "All three soil types within the development footprint are classified as either severe or very severe erosion hazards by the USDA." Mr. Iserson said there were erosion issues with the project and a lot of geotechnical work has been done, with additional study to be required on a lot by lot basis. Councilmember Cook-Kallio said she was astounded in how much work has gone into the project, complimented everyone involved, said she walked the ridge and one thing that helped her understand the development was seeing where the pads were actually going and how carefully they had been placed. Mr. Inderbitzen discussed lot placement, said the smallest lot was 30,000 square feet and the average lot was 45,000 square feet, so 20% was 9,000 square feet which was a very generous area for location of homes. He said other grading was done to stabilize landslide areas and he felt the package was very complete. Regarding fill areas, Councilmember Cook-Kallio confirmed that 600,000 to 700,000 yards of dirt would be spread and incorporated into the topography. A large portion was kept on- site into a barren tree site area, benches are cut into it, it is stabilized, compacted, roll it, vegetate it and it will mirror what was already there. She confirmed new trees would be monitored five years after their planting under the Tree Mitigation Plan and a bond is to be posted. She said it was her preference to determine how to create affordable housing rather than taking in-lieu fees. City Council Minutes 18 September 4, 2007