My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01a
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
101607
>
01a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/11/2007 2:17:41 PM
Creation date
10/11/2007 2:17:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/16/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01a
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
woodland, preserves and makes accessible the habitat, felt visibility was a concern of <br />neighbors but said the reduction in the number of homes also provides significant value <br />that allows the City to take ownership of the 500 acres. As an affordable housing <br />advocate, she said the use of the property is consistent and affords a place where people <br />can work and live in their community without having their quality of life diminished by a <br />lack of open space and recreational opportunities and thanked everyone involved in the <br />many hours and work on the project. <br />Dolores Bengtson agreed with Ms. Dennis' comments, thanked City staff for their work, <br />appreciates concerns voiced by residents, believed the project has been carefully planned <br />to minimize impacts of views, felt it would serve as an anchor for an open space park on <br />the eastern hills, its beauty and use will rival Pleasanton Ridge Park, the open space <br />community will actively partner to share the vision of the greenbelt as other east hills <br />properties come forward for development, it includes construction of public staging area, <br />multi-use trail system and connector link to the future regional trail, felt residents will take <br />advantage of recreational opportunities, felt ample time has been allowed for review of the <br />project and she urged the Council to move forward with approval. <br />Kurt Kummer felt views were spectacular, the trail system will connect the entire eastern <br />side of Pleasanton from Sunol to the Iron Horse Trail, felt the plan would save most of the <br />southeast hills, the feathering of development has been a long process, congratulated <br />those who came together to formulate the compromise, said there is no connection to <br />Benedict Court and urged the Council to approve the EIR. <br />Scott Walsh felt the homes and the lots will be mitigated from a public safety standpoint, <br />said there will be 100 foot setbacks, sprinklered homes, the City will receive a $300,000 to <br />$400,000 fire engine, the new community will be beautiful and he urged the Council to <br />approve the EIR. <br />Kay Ayala said she is shocked that the plan was before the Council, felt the land was <br />pristine and she was always told that the developer/owner had the right to split the land off <br />from Kottinger Hills when that development was approved, which was done. She said the <br />Council has every right to say not one house will be built on the land, the General Plan <br />talks about no building on the ridgeline, and felt this plan followed money and influence, <br />spoke of Planning Commissioner Fox's opposition and was greatly disappointed in how <br />this process and plan has come forward. <br />Alan Johansen commended the Council for their hard work, felt adding to open space <br />parks would be a great thing, it was important that the interest of the majority should <br />outweigh those who oppose the project, the land owner and developer have gone to great <br />lengths, the dialogue was healthy, the plan balances the interests of the community and <br />urged the Council to approve the EIR. <br />Tom Pico felt balancing the benefit against impacts was always a tough decision, wished a <br />plan could have been arrived similar to the Ponderosa/Busch property which was <br />approved by the Council and then overturned through a referendum and then ended up <br />with a project without any opposition. He said the goal for this project was to try to find <br />ways to mitigate impacts to those most affected which he felt had been done. He said the <br />permanent open space acreage is of great benefit, there was a lot of give and take <br />between all parties, there was broad community support and urged the Council support. <br />City Council Minutes 15 September 4, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.