My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENT 7
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
100207
>
11 ATTACHMENT 7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2007 12:32:00 PM
Creation date
9/25/2007 1:51:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
10/2/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENT 7
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Traffic Level-Of-Service Impacts/Mitigation Measures <br />Existing Plus Approved <br />Appendix F of the Environmental Impact Report includes the traffic study, "Report for <br />(the) Oak Grove Residential Traffic Stud}', dated April 14, 2006, prepared by <br />Dowling Associates for the proposed project. The report analyzed the <br />existing/approved/project scenario and cumulative build-out traffic scenario with the 98- <br />unit development plan, and a traffic alternative with a second public street connection to <br />New Vineyard Avenue through the Berlogar property. <br />Appendix F includes a set of tables that describe the trip generation rates used for the <br />a.m./p.m. peak commute hours. Using this methodology, the following table lists the <br />a.m./p.m. trips for the 98-unit plan from the Dowling report and for the 51-unit plan <br />calculated by staff. <br />Dowling Table 4 -Trip Generation Rates and Estimated Traffic <br />9 8-Unit Development Proposal <br />Use AM Rates PM Rates AM Trips PM Trips <br /> In Out In Out In Out In Out <br />Detached <br />Single-Family 98 units 0.33 0.42 0.55 0.45 32 41 54 44 <br />Residential Homes <br />Model School <br />Adjustment gg units 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 0 <br />Trail Staging Area 5 0 0 5 <br />Total New Trips 37 48 54 49 <br />51 -Unit Development Proposal <br />Use AM Rates PM Rates AM T rips PM T rips <br /> In Out In Out In Out In Out <br />Detached <br />Single-Family 51 units 0.33 0.42 0.55 0.45 17 21 28 23 <br />Residential Homes <br />Model School <br />Adjustment 51 units 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0 4 0 0 <br />Trail Staging Area 5 0 0 5 <br />Total New Trips 22 25 28 28 <br />Figure 6: "Table 4-Trip Generation Rates and Estimated Trafffc" from the Dowling <br />traffic report <br />At 9.8 trips per unit, the 98-unit and 51-unit development plans will generate 938 and <br />488 average daily trips, respectively. Although the 51-unit development plan will <br />generate 52-percent fewer trips, the traffic analysis was not revised for the 51-unit plan. <br />Hence, the analysis and mitigation measures for the 51-unit plan are those originally <br />identified for the 98-unit plan. Staff did not consider the reduction of trips to surrounding <br />streets and intersections for the 24-hour, a.m. peak hour, and p.m. peak hour to have a <br />comparable decrease in time-delay. Although a significant improvement in total trip <br />PUD-33 Page 21 of 59 June 13, 2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.