My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 050907
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 050907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:29:44 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:19:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/9/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and noted that it was a specific kind of development. She believed this site should have a <br />Pleasanton-specific urban edge without a lot of trellises. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor would not object to having one more level going up with the <br />parking garage. He believed that balconies were a very important feature of an apartment <br />and noted that people often put their bicycles and barbeques there. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank agreed with that assessment and noted that it was a market-driven <br />amenity. He believed an apartment without a balcony would be more difficult to rent. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum noted that a balcony would also add to the architectural interest of <br />the building. She believed it was a market-driven decision. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum believed it was important to ensure that the site was friendly to <br />people bringing bikes on BART. Ms. Decker noted that would be examined by staff and <br />that lockable bike racks would be included. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox would like to see the inclusion of anti-flip provisions if any units <br />became condos. <br /> <br />Mr. Heffner noted that the company was strongly in favor of building green. He noted <br />that an additional floor on the garage would change the type of the construction and that <br />more density would benefit the TOD. He noted that the 95-year ground lease with BART <br />stated that the units must be rented. He agreed with Commissioner Blank’s comments <br />with respect to the vibration and that the units should be checked. They had included <br />two-by-eight-foot balconies in the Anaheim building. He did not favor residents putting <br />barbeques on the balconies as a fire hazard and visual nuisance. He noted that each <br />courtyard had outdoor barbeques, courtyards, and Jacuzzis. He noted that there were also <br />full-service workout facilities in the project. Their projects were also designed to <br />accommodate satellite TV to keep individual satellite dishes off the balcony if possible. <br /> <br />No action was taken. <br /> <br /> <br />7.MATTERS INITIATED BY COMMISSION MEMBERS <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />b.Actions of the City Council <br /> <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 9, 2007 Page 19 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.