My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 050907
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 050907
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:29:44 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:19:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/9/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Site Plan <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum believed there should be a tot lot and was concerned that there may <br />not be enough room for tot lots and play areas. She generally accepted the layout. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olsen liked the layout and spoke in favor of a tot lot as well. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox described the changes to the site plan that she would like and would not <br />place any lawn area near the freeway. She would support removing all the <br />three-bedroom apartments and having all the micro-recreational areas combined into one <br />recreational lawn in the center of the site. She could not speak to the ingress/egress <br />points at this time and wanted to ensure there were several ways to get onto and out of the <br />site. She believed the three recreational areas should be consolidated into one lot. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank believed the general site layout was acceptable and was concerned <br />about freeway soot and exhaust as well as noise. He liked the kiosk use and believed the <br />vehicle access points were fine. He believed the on-site recreational facilities were fine. <br />He liked the tot lot and believed there should be several large self-enclosed amenities <br />without needing drive to the park. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pearce believed the safest place for a tot lot would be in the center of the <br />site away from the freeway. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor believed there should be at lease one tot lot and believed the <br />open space grass area in the noisiest part of the complex would not be a popular <br />recreation space. He would support moving the green space inside the complex but did <br />not want it to be enclosed too much. <br /> <br />Mr. Heffner noted that the green space was near the power lines and that was a constraint <br />to putting buildings there. He noted that would be a good place for dogs to be walked. <br /> <br />Mr. Tang noted that a large-scale apartment project with a central open space creates a <br />loss of identity. He did understand the Commissioners’ comments about a larger open <br />space. Acoustically, they tried to make a buffer on the freeway side by including the <br />green strip. <br /> <br />Commissioner Narum would like to see a more detailed visual to provide more <br />perspective on the open spaces. <br /> <br />Traffic, Circulation, Parking, Grading <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O’Connor regarding whether the residents <br />would be able to parking in the BART lot, Mr. Rennells replied that they would if they <br />paid the parking fee. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 9, 2007 Page 16 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.