PC 053007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Huff noted that they would like to move ahead, and he had no problems working with staff. He noted that he would be willing to work the issues out at staff level. Commissioner Pearce inquired how the building would look nice with the use of the slumpstone only on the front façade. Mr. Huff noted that the use of the slumpstone was architecturally correct and noted that there were many buildings in town that used additional architectural elements on the front elevation to enhance the appearance. He noted that slumpstone was used as a general wall surface. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Ms. Decker addressed this project’s requirements to return to the Planning Director, which staff supported. She noted that staff appreciated flexibility and that various architectural facades had been presented. She stated that Condition No. 1 indicated that minor changes to the plans may be made subject to the approval of the Planning Director and that if the Commission would like a dormer, that would not be considered a minor change and would need to come back. She encouraged the Commissioners to consider carefully the features that they were discussing in order to have enhanced flexibility. A discussion of the parapet and the HVAC units on the roof ensued. Chairperson Fox moved to approve PDR-602 as recommended by staff, with a modification to add language to Condition No. 1 to indicate that the Commission approves the flat roof with a dormer and the rust color and that removal of the dormer or substantial changes to the roof line will be approved by the Zoning Administrator and appealable to the Planning Commission. Commissioner Blank noted that he could not support that motion. Commissioner Narum added that she could not support the motion. Chairperson Fox modified the motion, deleting the phrase that allows the removal of the dormer or changes to the roofline to be approved by the Zoning Administrator and be appealable to the Commission. The modification was acceptable to Commissioner Blank and Commissioner Narum. Chairperson Fox proposed a modification to the first sentence of Condition No. 19 to indicate that stucco finish will be utilized on two elevations of the building and slumpstone on the side elevations of the building. Commissioner Blank noted that he could not support that addition and believed that the slumpstone should be subject to the approval of the Planning Director throughout the building; otherwise, stucco could be utilized. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 30, 2007 Page 6 of 20