Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Decker noted that the second paragraph on page 11 reads: “Chairperson Fox <br />reiterated that she would prefer it to be R-1-20,000 and would not be able to support the <br />amendment. She retracted her second to the initial motion.” She noted that Chairperson <br />Fox had stated that she could not support the increase in the square footage to <br />6,600 square feet plus the 700-square-foot exemption because it was greater than that <br />allowed by the R-1-20,000 zoning district. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that during the discussion of design styles of PUD-62/PGPA-13, <br />Windstar Communities, Inc., she recalled a discussion about the colors and the issue of <br />preferred styles and that she had mentioned styles found in San Mateo and trellises. She <br />requested that staff confirm the language discussing different areas within the Bay Area <br />that would be good to consider. <br /> <br />Commissioner Blank moved to approve the May 9, 2007 minutes as amended. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br /> <br /> <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Olson, Narum, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br /> <br />The motion passed, and the minutes of May 9, 2007, were approved as amended. <br /> <br />3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO <br />ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS <br />NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA. <br /> <br />There were no speakers. <br /> <br />4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA <br /> <br />Ms. Decker advised that two pieces of correspondence had been received from the <br />Montgomerys and Ceizler regarding Item 6.c., Chun Kim. While the correspondence did <br />not specifically request that the item be continued, the Montgomery correspondence <br />requested that the Planning Commission consider reducing the size and visibility from the <br />valley floor prior to approval, and the Ceizler requested that the Planning Commission <br />not make a decision without formally involving the homeowners association. Staff felt <br />that there has been considerable effort made by staff, the homeowners association, and <br />the Kims to find the best design for the proposed home that relates to all of the concerns <br />and suggested that the Planning Commission discuss this matter. <br /> <br />The Planning Commissioners concurred that they were ready to hear the item. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 23, 2007 Page 3 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />