PC 052307 - Laserfiche WebLink

a separate junction box or coax cable with separate junction boxes. Ms. Decker confirmed that the standard condition requiring state-of-the-art communications could have that language added.. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding the LEED point rating, Ms. Soo replied that the project had 93 points. Commissioner Olson noted that in the second geotechnical review by Engeo, Inc., the comment section read, “No comment needed.” He noted that in the March 1 letter, Comment No. 5 contained a specific recommendation that the project be conditioned that a document be recorded with a deed for the property stating that the site was located within a large, ancient landslide area. He added that he could not find that statement in the conditions. Ms. Decker noted that there was discussion that the storm drain system must comply with the geotechnical peer review, and Condition No. 52 discussed the geotechnical consultant to be on-site. She added that there was typically a condition of approval that stated that it must comply with the recommendations of the geotechnical report and/or a peer review. Commissioner Olson noted that Comment No. 5 in the March 1 letter was specific, and he would like to see it included in the conditions of approval. Commissioner Blank concurred with that suggestion. In response to the Commissioners’ questions about colors, Ms. Decker replied that there should be some direction or consensus from the Planning Commission regarding the range of colors that would aid in the Planning Director review. She noted that the photomontage and printing, daylamps notwithstanding, may or may not accurately depict the colors. When approval is sought from the applicant, color chips would be submitted and examined in relation to the elevations and renderings. She noted that could be included in the conditions. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding whether normal non-reflective glass would be used, Ms. Decker replied that there had been no discussion of which she was aware. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Fox regarding the slope at the location of the house pad, Ms. Soo replied that the architect or civil engineer could provide that answer. Chairperson Fox noted that the garage was 1,078 square feet and inquired whether there was a restriction on garage size on some higher levels of the ridge. Ms. Soo replied that was not the case in the subject district. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding whether there were any ordinance or General Plan guidelines with respect to any restrictions on hillsides dependent on grades, Ms. Decker confirmed that there were not. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 23, 2007 Page 11 of 20