PC 051607 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairperson Fox noted that Item 5.b., PCUP-191, Derek and Linda Barragan, would be continued to May 23, 2007. She added that she had received a request from Bonnie Krichbaum and Art Dunkley to continue Item 6.b., PCUP-185, Steve Black, Generations HealthCare of Pleasanton, LLC, and requested that that item be continued to a future meeting. Chairperson Fox requested staff comment with respect to continuing Item 6.a., PUD-05-02M, James Happ, Northstar Realty Services, Inc./Kenneth and Pamela Chrisman. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding whether a continued item would be placed at the beginning of the next agenda, Ms. Harryman referred to page 43 of the Commissioner’s Handbook: “Any Commissioner may continue an item not subject to a legally or City-imposed deadline to the next Commission meeting, or to another date agreeable to a majority of the Commission.” Chairperson Fox requested that members of the audience be able to speak about continued items during Meeting Open to the Public. Commissioner Blank noted that while that would be a good idea, he added that other members of the public who did not attend because the item had been continued should be able to speak as well. Ms. Decker advised that staff did not request the continuation of Item 6.b., PCUP-185, Steve Black, Generations HealthCare of Pleasanton, LLC. She noted that an email had been received from Chairperson Fox to continue the item and that staff had written a memo clarifying the points in terms of the times staff received information and had forwarded that memo to the Commissioners. She clarified that Chairperson Fox had requested that both Item 6.a. and Item 6.b. be continued. Ms. Decker stated that she had also sent an email to all of the Commissioners listing several items that had been brought forth by Steve Brozosky with respect to Item 6.a. and recommended to the Commission that the item be continued. She noted that staff frequently makes that recommendation and that the Commission would decide whether or not that was a reasonable request. She noted that while the Commission frequently concurred with staff’s recommendations to continue an item, it would be unknown until the hearing actually occurred. She noted that Mr. Brozosky was unsure whether he would be able to attend and added that copies of the memos were available to the public. She reiterated that the Chair had requested that both items be continued. Chairperson Fox noted that she did indeed request that Item 6.a. and Item 6.b. be continued and noted that the point of clarification was whether she requested that Item 6.a. be continued after staff had already requested that it be continued. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES May 16, 2007 Page 2 of 8