PC 032807 - Laserfiche WebLink

document. She noted that page 45 of the staff report stated that the owners would dedicate nearly 500 acres of open space to the City or other public entity such as a Geologic Hazard Assessment District (GHAD), which had the City Council acting as the Board of Directors. She believed a third party should hold that post and that a political body should not hold a conservation easement. She noted that the Councilmembers would change over time and that there was a lot of pressure on Councils and Commissions by the State and public interest groups to provide more housing or a different kind of park setting, and cited the initiative put forth by Brian Arkin and Steve Brozosky to limit housing on the Bernal property. She noted that No. 69 on page 26 stated that “the open space area shall be subject to an open space easement and shall be in accordance with the requirements of the development agreement.” She noted that the development agreement stated that the open space would be given to “an entity reasonably acceptable to the City to protect the open space as permanent open space.” She noted that the phrase “reasonably acceptable to the City” bothered her as well. She noted that the findings stated that the “conservation easement will be granted to the Tri- Valley Conservancy, providing second-party inspection and oversight of the open space area,” which she believed was the most secure guarantee possible. She noted that the overriding considerations addressed the oak woodlands and noted that she attended an oak woodlands planner workshop that had been held in Livermore on Thursday, March 21, 2007. She noted there was considerable discussion about planting shrubs above a certain height below the oaks, which would kill the oaks. Dolores Bengtson, 568 Hamilton Way, noted that she wished to comment on the Oak Grove project and read the following letter from Julie Casamajor, resident at 2018 Foxswallow Road, into the record: “Please vote yes to provide a convenient staging area and an internal trail system to the public open space proposed to the Oak Grove Project. “I was present at the Trails Committee discussion of the proposed Alternative 5 which has addressed the major concerns of those in the immediate vicinity. I will be out of town at the Planning Commission meeting and want to make my support for community access to this extraordinary area known. “Many Pleasanton residents who will use the trails will not be at the Planning Commission meeting. They will be hurrying from work, various school and team related activities, making dinner and taking care of family obligations. They will use the trails from time to time, particularly if access is convenient and the trail is not too long for an afternoon stroll. Pleasanton residents appreciate the opportunity to get outdoors, and the Oak Grove project provides us all with a great opportunity to do so. “I urge your full support for including the staging area and internal trails in the Oak Grove project so all residents will be able to enjoy the beautiful open space park.” PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 28, 2007 Page 7 of 16