PC 032807 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Chairperson Fox believed that some materials for the Oak Grove project had not been distributed within 72 hours of the Commission meeting. She noted that Meeting Open to the Public may be reopened to hear the public comment for that item. Ms. Decker noted that there was a request for Item 5.b., PUD-61, Emil and Marjorie Oxsen, to be continued. Ms. Decker further noted that there was also a request from Mr. Lee Fulton and Mr. Rick Bentley to continue Item 6.b., PUD-33, James Tong/Charter Properties; Jennifer Lin, Frederic Lin, and Kevin Lin. Mr. Bentley expressed concern regarding a safety issue regarding the EVA through Grey Eagle Court; Mr. Fulton expressed concern that the packet was so large and would require additional time to read the material. Ms. Decker noted that the Commission could continue the item, continue the item and take public testimony, or deny the request and have staff present the report as usual. She noted that since so many people have attended, she suggested that the Commission consider continuing the item and taking public testimony. The items would be continued to the April 25, 2007 as the Staples Ranch Scoping Session has already been noticed for the April 11, 2007 meeting. Commissioner Blank advised that he would recuse himself from the discussion on Item 6.b. He believed that any Planning Commissioner could request continuance of an item one time only. Ms. Decker replied that was correct but that it required a Commission vote if a member of the public requested the continuance. The Commissioners discussed if Item 6.b. should be continued and if public testimony should be accepted. They wished to have the applicant’s opinion if there was a preference in having a staff presentation or not. Martin Inderbitzen, representing the applicant, noted that they did not have a preference, but he believed that it may make more sense to have the project presented at the time of the actual hearing if it is continued to April 25, 2007. He believed that it may be more courteous to hear the public testimony at this time. Commissioner Blank suggested that Item 5.b. be considered first. Chairperson Fox moved to continue PUD-61, Emil and Marjorie Oxsen. Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 28, 2007 Page 2 of 16