PC 032807 - Laserfiche WebLink

given to Stoneridge Drive residents that gave no indication of any possible extension of Stoneridge Drive. He noted that it would be impossible to sue a developer that has since gone out of business. He wanted the City to ensure that the disclosures were properly made. He did not particularly favor rental property on that site. He believed Lot 11 could use some work, either situationally or visually. He noted that the photomontage mixed up the 98-home project and the 51-home project and that it was very difficult to see the pictures on the montage. He supported Mr. Regan’s comments about conservation easements being under independent control and not under the control of a political body or a pressure group. Overall, he believed this was a very good project. David Camp. 1374 Benedict Court, noted that he wished to comment on the Oak Grove project and wished there was a way that this entire property could be permanently protected as open space rather than a mile of homes on a ridge. He would like the view from the high areas looking down to be considered as well. He would like the open space to be permanently and independently protected against additional homes or other uses such as motocross. He liked the proposal for the staging area in the new development, which was of a modest size. He did not want staging areas near existing homes or streets. He wanted to keep the trails away from existing streets and homes, creating a de facto staging area. He supported one EVA road as proposed through Grey Eagle Court. He believed that construction traffic would be a huge impact and would like very strict controls on them. He would like some assurance from the City that developments would not be added to the end of existing roads. He was opposed to rental units. He noted that Lot 51 was a large protrusion into contiguous open space and that it was the only valley lot in the development. Sandra Bierre, 980 Riesling Drive, noted that she wished to comment on the Oak Grove project and supported the comments of Dolores Bengtson and Becky Dennis and complimented their work on the ridge. She noted that she was a member of the Livermore Amador Garden Club, as was Ms. Bengtson, and added that they had walked the ridge to see the wildflowers. They were very excited to have the opportunity to walk in this area. A recess was called at 8:23 p.m. Acting Chairperson Fox reconvened the meeting at 8:33 p.m. 6.PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS Chairperson Fox requested verbatim transcription of the Meeting Open to the Public item. Mr. Roush believed that detailed minutes would be sufficient. Chairperson Fox wanted to ensure that the speakers’ comments were reflected in detail. a. City Capital Improvement Program for FY2007-08 through FY2010-11 Identification of priority projects for City Council consideration as part of the FY2007-08 through FY2010-11 City Capital Improvement Program. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 28, 2007 Page 10 of 16