Laserfiche WebLink
and then provide access to the Hatsushi property. He noted that the Engineering <br />Department has been working on the detailed design work and that the general alignment <br />was shown in the Specific Plan. He added that the exact location of the road would be <br />engineered to take design considerations, slopes, and emergency access into account. He <br />was aware that these issues had been under discussion between the City and Mr. Jardin <br />for some time and that the road was pushed further up the hill, away from his house. <br />When the Hatsushi PUD was approved by the City Council in 2005, the construction of <br />the Clara Lane extension was a very high priority to them. A condition of approval was <br />added to indicate a preference that Clara Lane be extended to the Hatsushi property at the <br />earliest feasible opportunity. He noted that it was fortunate that Mr. Aminian’s plan was <br />going through at the same time. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O’Connor regarding the removal of trees in <br />front of Mr. Jardin’s home, Mr. Jost replied that when Delco Builders entered into an <br />agreement with Mr. Jardin to subdivide his property, there was also a discussion <br />regarding the extension of Clara Lane. At that time, Delco Builder’s engineers prepared <br />an alignment plan, shown as Exhibit F. Grant deeds to the City for both the right of way <br />of Clara Lane and easements as well as construction easements were sent to Mr. Jardin, <br />who then signed those deeds, which were turned over to the City. Staff felt that the grant <br />deeds signed by Mr. Jardin at that time were sufficient for the alignment. There was also <br />a grant deed to the City by Mr. Nespor, which added to the alignment for Clara Lane, <br />which did not have much wiggle room. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Olson regarding whether the new road would <br />be farther north than the current edge, Mr. Jost confirmed that was correct and displayed <br />the layout of the road on the overhead screen. He added that Mr. Jardin’s house would be <br />below the grade and that a three-foot retaining wall would be installed. <br /> <br />A discussion of the setback measurements ensued. <br /> <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding whether the legal issues <br />surrounding Mr. Jardin’s property had been resolved, Ms. Harryman replied that there <br />had been several phone meetings with Mr. Jardin’s attorney, and that this issue had been <br />thoroughly discussed and resolved. She realized that Mr. Jardin was not happy with the <br />results and that it was close to his home. She noted that this was the deal struck with <br />Mr. Jardin when he sold the property to Delco Builders. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor suggested that the City narrow the road slightly if possible, near <br />the small setback on Mr. Jardin’s property by removing the parking allowed on one side <br />of the street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Olson inquired whether the retaining wall could be placed at the edge of <br />the current paved road and work from there. Mr. Jost believed there may be a problem <br />getting down to Mr. Jardin’s driveway if that were to occur, and that he may have to give <br />up the driveway in front of his house. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10, 2007 Page 7 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />