My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011007
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 011007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:53 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:04:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
setback. After he read the report, he met with some of the neighbors and reduced the <br />grading to bring the height to 25 feet. He also added nine trees to the landscaping plan to <br />include pepper trees and non-fruit olive trees to increase the screening in the back; there <br />are now 16 trees in the back yard. He noted that there was a misunderstanding about the <br />location of storypole 5 due to the general contractor’s mislabeling of the pole, and he <br />clarified it in his letter of January 2, 2007. He would like to build Clara Lane first to <br />bring all the utilities to the site, and then build the homes on Lots 3 and 2 and build the <br />house on Lot 1 last. <br /> <br />Aman Bawa, 2632 Ingrid Court, noted that overall he had no issues with the construction <br />itself and added that it would be an attractive addition to the neighborhood. He was <br />concerned about the construction traffic using Clara Lane and thanked staff for <br />acknowledging that concern. He hoped there would be an equal and fair distribution of <br />traffic going up his road. He was very concerned about trucks using the road early in the <br />morning and late at night and requested that any construction traffic using Clara Lane not <br />come up before 8:00 a.m. or leave after 5:00 p.m. He was also concerned about the <br />safety of the older children and teenagers on the road, and babies having their sleep <br />disrupted. He noted that a $10,000 bond was posted to address any damages and was <br />concerned that the new roundabout would be damaged by the trucks. <br /> <br />Dave Flashberger, 874 Gray Fox Circle, noted that he purchased his home to enjoy the <br />privacy and quiet environment. He was very concerned about the loss of privacy and <br />property value that may result because of the impacts of this project. He believed the <br />residents who live in developments at a higher elevation than this project should be <br />notified, such as Grey Eagle Estates and Crestablanca Drive. He believed that some of <br />staff’s recommendation were heading in the right direction and would like to see a grade <br />at least five feet to lower the property’s vertical visual impact. He also suggested moving <br />the home farther to the north to reduce its visual impact on his property. <br /> <br />Chris Beratlis, 10 Beratlis Place, spoke in support of this project. He noted that he lived <br />at a higher elevation than this property. He noted that while he would have a full view of <br />this property, he did not have any objection to the project. He believed this was a high- <br />quality development that fit into the neighborhood. He noted that the applicant had <br />complied with every request made in the staff report and noted that the 25-foot height <br />was lower than many surrounding homes. <br /> <br />Muthana Ibrahim, project architect, 2960 Camino Diablo, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, noted <br />that he would be available to answer any questions. <br /> <br />Jeff Nespor, 837 Clara Lane, noted that he lived next door to the subject property; he <br />shared the neighborhood concerns about traffic and noted that they had been addressed in <br />the staff report. He expressed concern about the logistics and details of the Clara Lane <br />extension, particularly the drainage, construction of the retaining wall, and repair of any <br />potential damage during construction. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10, 2007 Page 5 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.