My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011007
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 011007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:53 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:04:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Ms. Harryman noted that it would have been required for Planning Commission <br />meetings. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that a 300-foot notice would have been acceptable under Planning law <br />but that those agendas were handled under Parks and Community Services law. He noted <br />that the Planning Department exceeded noticing requirements. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor requested that staff clarify this issue with respect to Planning <br />Commissioners attending outside meetings and making comment as a resident. <br /> <br />Ms. Harryman noted that if Commissioners wished to speak as residents and planned to <br />recuse themselves from the Planning hearing, that would be fine. She added that she <br />would follow up this matter with a memo to the Commissioners. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that they wished to avoid any appearance of prejudicial actions. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox stated that she had requested a copy of the staff report for that meeting <br />and had not received it by email or online. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION'S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />a. Future Planning Calendar <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />b.Actions of the City Council <br /> <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />Actions of the Zoning Administrator <br />c. <br /> <br />Commissioner O’Connor noted that the Colliers International item contained a misprint <br />regarding the total number of acres, and it was short about 7 acres. <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson noted that was common open space, which was a commercial condominium <br />project. He noted that there were separate parcels required to be commonly owned by the <br />owners and added that it should have been worded more precisely. <br /> <br />8. MATTERS FOR COMMISSION’S REVIEW/ACTION <br /> <br />No discussion was held or action taken. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10, 2007 Page 26 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.