My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011007
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
PC 011007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 3:28:53 PM
Creation date
8/17/2007 10:04:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/10/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Chairperson Fox requested that the following language also be added on page 3: “Acting <br />Chairperson Fox also inquired about bike lane changes. She recalled that three years <br />ago, staff, through the Traffic Committee, attempted to make changes to the Stoneridge <br />Drive bike lanes. Council directed staff to make the changes only through the City <br />Council.” <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox requested that the following language be added to the end of the first <br />paragraph on page 4: “This was a project with a gymnasium that had recently been <br />denied by the City of Livermore Planning Commission and the Alameda County Planning <br />Commission.” <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that in the first paragraph of page 5, she believed she stated the <br />there was a change from 35 feet to 30 feet in the City of Livermore’s Cedar Grove <br />Church project. <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that the first sentence of the third full paragraph on page 5 should <br />be changed to read as follows: “In response to Acting Chairperson Fox’s inquiry <br />regarding why the Church decided to combine both the buildings originally proposed on <br />the property next to Nielsen Park and change them to the site located place the building <br />next to Rheem Drive rather than at its location on the 1998 Master Plan….” <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox believed she had addressed a question to either Mr. Iserson or Mr. Otto <br />regarding whether a conditional use permit was required because staff considered the <br />gymnasium to be a private recreational facility in an A District. She believed that <br />Mr. Iserson replied that no conditional use permit would be required. She requested that <br />that following language be added on page 5: “Acting Chairperson Fox noted that in the <br />previous Master Plan staff reports, a conditional use permit would be required for a <br />future school. Mr. Iserson indicated that he felt the school did not require a conditional <br />use permit when that would be proposed in the future.” <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that the fist sentence of the last paragraph on page 6 should be <br />modified to read as follows: “In response to an inquiry by Acting Chairperson Fox <br />regarding whether it would be feasible to move the gymnasium towards the front along <br />Stoneridge Drive so that the tallest portion of the building would be away from the <br />adjacent neighbors, Mr. Miller replied….” <br /> <br />Chairperson Fox noted that the first sentence of the last paragraph on page 8 should be <br />modified to read as follows: “Acting Chairperson Fox noted that the proposed project <br />had the gym open from 10:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. She further noted that the conditions of <br />approval for the Early Learning Institute…provided for operating hours from 7:00 a.m. to <br />6:00 p.m. on weekdays only with no school activities of any type allowed in the evening <br />and weekends.” <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10, 2007 Page 19 of 27 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.