PC 011007 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Schwartz noted that his wife and Ms. Giffin had done a significant amount of work looking into what other cities deemed to be appropriate parking requirements for live- work units. He noted that a table was included that described one to two-and-a-half parking spots for each live-work unit. Ms. Schwartz noted that it was not intended to be an extremely busy building. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner O’Connor regarding the number of people using the pilates studio at one time, Ms. Schwartz replied that there may be a maximum of four people in a group. Commissioner O’Connor inquired what the contingency plan was if the business portion of a live-work unit closed. Ms. Schwartz noted that they must have an active business license. A discussion ensued about the possibility of a business failing. Commissioner Blank noted that in Europe, the unit was deeded as a single unit. If the business failed, the person could continue to live there as long as they made payments to the bank. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Fox regarding whether the unit could be subleased to a renter, Commissioner Pearce noted that would not be possible and noted that in many cities such as Berkeley and Glendale, the live or work portions could not be rented to subtenants. The Commission then addressed each question. Should the building be located on the east or west side of the lot? Commissioner Blank believed the east side would be more appealing because having the lead-in space would be better. He believed that if the building were closer to Main Street, the view down the north side of Spring Street would be blocked. Commissioner Pearce noted that she is supportive of the live-work concept. She liked the redwoods on the west side and believed that it provided some space before approaching the buildings on the lot. Commissioner Olson believed the building should be on located on the east side of the lot. Commissioner O’Connor believed it should be located on the west side. He would like to see at least one redwood saved. He would also like to see the front of the building set back from Spring Street. He believed a three-story building on the east side would dwarf the adjacent home being remodeled. He believed the back side of the buildings on Main PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 10, 2007 Page 13 of 27