My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN050107
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
CCMIN050107
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2007 11:48:10 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 4:29:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/1/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN050107
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
parallel with this effort, establish a process to identify the necessary regional and other <br />local improvements that need completion in concert with and as conditions for, the <br />construction of the Stoneridge Drive extension. The goal of the process would be to <br />create a circulation plan for Pleasanton that considers the interaction of local street <br />networks with the regional system. He said the traffic model indicates that building the <br />extension needs to be examined in context of the other improvements to mitigate the <br />negative impacts that the failing freeways will have on the community. To him, building it <br />now is a recipe for disaster without the pre-requisites in place. He felt the solution to these <br />transportation problems is largely regional and should not be solved on the city streets. <br />He also thinks this is a task that should not be left wholly to future City Councils. This <br />circulation plan is a part of our work in developing our build out General Plan. We do need <br />some flexibility in the future so that future councils can adapt to those conditions, whatever <br />they are, so he wanted to explore how to balance this plan with that flexibility. <br /> <br />Finally, he believes that approaching it in this way creates greater leverage for the Council <br />in working with the region, especially on the State Route 84 question. Also, as part of the <br />proposal, the Council would adopt the circulation plan as General Plan policy and then ask <br />the voters to ratify the decision. He believes this will ensure the process and resulting plan <br />developed is supported by the community as a whole. He agreed the City has a long <br />history and heritage of citizen and community participation in democracy and decision- <br />making processes and he thinks people have come to expect this on projects that have <br />long term impacts on the entire community. And, people may take this to the ballot which <br />may happen if it is not done right. He felt ratification would ensure the Council is doing the <br />right thing. He feels the Council needs to show leadership, needs to try and bring the <br />community together over the issues, needs to re-engage the region to develop <br />improvements, State Route 84 needs to be high on that list, he was open to discussing the <br />details and hopes we can work through this tonight. He was supportive of moving forward <br />with the preferred land use option for the completion of the General Plan, but as these <br />other things come forward, most specifically Hacienda TOD, we need the flexibility to <br />examine this and decide if this makes sense for Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cook-Kallio commended the Mayor and Councilmember Sullivan on their <br />leadership, feels it is difficult to have campaigned over and over on an issue and then <br />have to re-evaluate a position. It also characterizes what she has found being new to the <br />Council; we don’t always agree, thinks we have shown leadership in the way we have <br />dealt with one another in respect, things they have always acted in the communities best <br />interest after voting, said she is astounded at the amount of work that has gone into this <br />and thanked staff, knows how much Pleasanton cares about its community, feels <br />everyone has an opinion and is able to provide input, noted the significant number of e- <br />mails, thinks that the theme most important to her is being able to discuss things using <br />civic value and principles, believes Stoneridge should be left in the General Plan and felt it <br />is benign. She felt the Council still needed to talk about how that is going to look, she has <br />opinions about things like the EVA and not being able to use it, understands the idea <br />about child safety and schools, but these are conditions that exist all over Pleasanton and <br />we are not going to change the fact that traffic is going to enter the city and it is going to <br />continue to get worse for all of us. She felt the question that remains is how we are going <br />to manage that traffic and circulation. Refusing to extend Stoneridge Drive will not stop <br />the cars from coming. In addition, we are dependent upon getting people in and out of the <br />city to work in order to fund the amenities we are used to. We are approaching build out, <br />we need people to come shop and eat, businesses to feel this is an atmosphere in which <br /> <br />City Council Minutes 19 May 1, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.