CCMIN082906 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember Brozosky referred to Program 22.2 about developing disaster preparedness material targeted to businesses and employees and felt the same type of material should be developed to target the residents. Principal Planner Stern believed that was covered by Policy 21, which is promoting public safety through public education programs. Councilmember Brozosky acknowledged there were flyers and things, but people can't find them when there is a disaster. He suggested a laminated card or something else that can be found easily. He suggested a card that said here is what you do in the first 24 hours that could be kept by the telephone. Follow-up information could be included in the newsletter. He believed 90% of the community has no idea what to do in an emergency. He also wanted a plan for seniors and the disabled. He thought there should be a policy that supports neighborhood watch programs and also to continue to utilize volunteers in the police department. They do a lot of work that people are not aware of. Councilmember McGovern referred to the fact that the Police Department is designated as the Emergency Operations Center and asked if that building was damaged, was there an alternative. If so, that should be listed in the Element. Assistant City Manager Bocian said the alternative location was Fire Station No. 2 by Stoneridge Mall. Councilmember McGovern commented that the City and School District have worked closely on emergency plans, yet she did not see any discussion of that in the Element. She felt that was a large portion of the community and there should be discussion about coordination of efforts so the community feels there is a broad, comprehensive plan. Mayor Hosterman pointed out that both Chiefs were nodding that those plans are indeed in place. She noted everyone had had a chance to comment on the Public Safety Element and she was satisfied that this portion of the General Plan is more than adequate to serve the safety needs of the people of Pleasanton. She then requested comments on the draft Conservation and Open Space Element. Councilmember Thorne requested a standard definition of the word sustainability. He felt there was too much of a blunt statement that the city would use products that allow it to practice sustainability. There should be something that allows a review of the life cycle of certain products. Sometimes there is more energy used in manufacturing or mining of a product that creates a greater environmental hazard than the product to be used. One cannot simply say use recycled material without finding out what is really environmentally responsible. He referred to a list of where heritage trees were located, but felt in some of the more mature neighborhoods there are trees that have grown to that designation. He suggested staying with the measurements as to what constitutes a heritage tree rather than setting out locations. Councilmember Sullivan continued with discussion of sustainability. He noted the City had adopted a definition similar to the UN definition, which is meeting the needs of the current generation without compromising those of future generations. He said there were also references to environmental, social and economic sustainability and he felt it was important to have those three elements in the General Plan. He did not object to the sustainability definition included in the Conservation and Open Space Element because it General Plan Workshop Minutes 18 August 29, 2006