My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081506
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN081506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
8/10/2006 11:25:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/15/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN081506
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Council member McGovem believed an additional evaluation should be <br />completed to show the variables because the contingency may not be enough <br />to complete the improvements in the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan <br />area. She questioned whether 618 gallons per day is the normal average daily <br />use of water by persons in a single family residence. <br /> <br />Mr. Cuesnza responded that for many of the larger, well landscaped lots within <br />Ruby Hill, the normal average use is anywhere from 4 to 5 times higher than <br />600 gallon per day, especially during the summertime. <br /> <br />Councilmember McGovem questioned the staff report statement that the City <br />had enough money to complete these improvements because it appears in the <br />VCSP financing plan that there is over a $1.1 million shortfall. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson responded the current balance in the Specific Plan fund account has <br />$2.2 million for funding remaining improvements; staff recommends using $1.1 <br />million of the $2.2 million to fund the water tank and related improvements. <br /> <br />Council member McGovern still had concerns about committing $4 million <br />dollars toward a project that does not have a financing plan in place for the <br />remainder of the improvements. <br /> <br />Vice Mayor Sullivan reviewed what staff was requesting. He wanted to take <br />into consideration fairness to the rate payers and how to address the fact that <br />more water was being used than originally thought. <br /> <br />City Manager Fialho indicated Council could take the position to pass all these <br />additional costs to the remaining units in the Vineyard Corridor. There is an <br />argument that the financing program is not fair because as more development <br />occurs, the remaining costs need to be borne by the undeveloped lots. Staff is <br />reviewing alternatives such as increased fees and water rate adjustments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Thome inquired whether the water tank needed to be built <br />regardless of a financing plan. He thought that if it were delayed, the cost <br />would continue to increase. <br /> <br />Mr. Wilson responded that at some point the water tank has to be built. <br /> <br />Motion: It was m/s by Thorne/Sullivan to approve plans and specifications, <br />award the construction contract with Tetra Tech Inc., to perform construction <br />management services for the project, amend the purchase and sale agreement <br />with Threehand LP, and direct staff to develop a financing plan for the <br />remaining portions of the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan Area <br />Infrastructure. Motion failed by the following vote: <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />August 15, 2006 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.