Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Fialho acknowledged the problem with the statement is that is says "will provide" <br />incentives. Perhaps promoting incentives allows flexibility so that in the future, as projects come <br />forward, Council can give input without feeling its hands are tied. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman felt a positive incentive might be streamlining the permitting process. <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne then referred to the requirement for businesses and multi-family residences <br />to participate in recycling programs. If the city requires participation, that implies some kind of <br />enforcement and he asked how that would be done. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern said that refers to the fact that there is a requirement for trash container areas <br />and those areas would then have to have recycling bins. One cannot force people to recycle, <br />but there can be a requirement for the hardware to be available for recycling. <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne felt the city should be cautious about getting into regulations for the School <br />District, such as minimum enrollments. He did not think that was Council's responsibility. On <br />another matter, he was uncertain about where a neighborhood park could be placed in the <br />Happy Valley area. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern said she had several comments. She started with the School District and <br />indicated all the written material on the General Plan should be sent to the School Board for <br />their review. They are the elected officials who make policy decisions for the District. She did <br />not want to discuss anything regarding the District at this meeting. She agreed with Mr. Sullivan <br />that there should be a review of the Zone 7 Stream Management Plan and inclusion in the <br />General Plan somehow. Regarding wastewater and odor problems, she referred to maintaining <br />the Odor Advisory Group and the hotline, setting an odor management goal or offsetting air <br />emission quality standard, but was uncertain if those regulations should be set forth elsewhere <br />or in the General Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern indicated those concerns would be addressed in the Air Quality Element. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern indicated she had attended DSRSD and Zone 7 meetings where water <br />quality was discussed and she noted there was some concern about Zone 7 drilling additional <br />wells and tapping the groundwater basin that could decrease water quality by overuse of the <br />groundwater basin. She asked if there was something in the Water Element that referred to <br />maintaining the groundwater basin at a certain level to maintain quality, taste and reduce the <br />hardness of the water? <br /> <br />Mr. Cusenza indicated that was on page VI-12. There is reference to groundwater <br />storage levels. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho said a better place to look was page VI-35, Program 9.12, where it says, <br />"Work with Zone 7 to implement water facility upgrades to improve water taste and to decease <br />water hardness." <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern approved adding the new Program 9.14 and quoted the wording. She <br />then referred to page VI-16 about solid waste and the fact that 20% of the solid waste originates <br />outside the Pleasanton city limits. She asked if that affected the 50% waste diversion goals? <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho said no. <br /> <br />General Plan WOrkshop <br />City Council <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />OS/23/06 <br />