My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052306
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN052306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
5/23/2006 4:58:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/23/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN052306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. Public Facilities and Communltv ProGrams Element of the General Plan: <br />Review and provide comments on a Draft Public Facilities Element of the General Plan. <br />(SR 06:147) <br /> <br />Janice Stern presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman indicated the issue of water was extremely important to her. She <br />noted 62% of the city's water came from the snow pack and to date there is no plan to protect <br />the property across the Sierra to protect the water supply. She wanted to include a Water <br />Element in the General Plan. The State of California will soon mandate a water element in all <br />cities' general plans. She referred to a set of water principles that was recently passed by the <br />Local Government Commission that deals with water availability and water quality. Every <br />agency in California is being asked to ratify these principles. The State Water Control Board <br />has already ratified these principles and has indicated the funding to agencies will be based on <br />whether they had ratified the principles. She asked Council to keep an open mind regarding a <br />water element. She noted the Local Government Commission was developing a template for <br />water elements to make ratification of the same an easier process. Pleasanton is a water <br />retailer and she felt it was even more imperative to consider the element. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan completely supported the idea. He felt water quality, supply, disposal, <br />wastewater and storm water runoff were all one issue. There is an element for transportation, <br />air quality, and soon for energy. He felt adequate supplies of clean water and dealing with <br />storm water and disposal were some of the most critical infrastructure challenges for the city. <br />As the State and the Valley continues to grow with more demands on those resources, it <br />becomes more important to have good planning guidelines. He supported the Ahwanhee Water <br />Principles mentioned by the Mayor, which are good management practices for water use and <br />disposal. He presented comments on current policies: Under Policy 9, he wanted more <br />language about water conservation strategies for the long term. For instance, work with Zone 7 <br />to develop conservation plans and strategies for the long term. He further suggested <br />reexamining the tiered rate structure for residential and commercial users to encourage <br />conservation. He noted Pleasanton has a representative on the water retailers board to <br />address water quality issues. He wanted that listed in the General Plan as something to <br />continue to do. He suggested a policy to "encourage water retailers to continue to work with <br />Zone 7 on water conservation and quality issues." Over the last few years, real progress has <br />been made in working with Zone 7. On page VI-12, it indicates storm water runoff issues are to <br />be covered under the conservation and open space element. If there were a Water Element, <br />these issues would be taken care of. He felt all the water issues should be looked at from the <br />same General Plan Element because they are all interrelated. He felt there should be some <br />mention of the new Zone 7 Stream Management Master Plan. The city should review it and <br />give input. There is also a newly commissioned study for improvement of stream flows to <br />support steelhead habitats in Zone 7 streams. The city should also be involved in that. Those <br />two issues should be part of the Water Element. He asked about the status of the construction <br />and demolition ordinance as referred to on page VI-17. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho indicated it is in draft form and was reviewed by the Planning Commission <br />several years ago. It was not presented to Council due to some problems with the city's hauler. <br />It will come to Council in the future. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan referred to page VI-45, Program 24.4, under the Wi-Fi policy, he felt it <br />should "explore Wi-Fi opportunities" because he did not think a decision had been made to <br />provide Wi-Fi downtown. <br /> <br />General Plan Workshop <br />City Council <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />OS/23/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.