My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052306
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN052306
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
5/23/2006 4:58:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/23/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN052306
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Brozosky supported expanding the wi-fi to public areas throughout the city, such as <br />parks. He cited Program 26.10 and indicated he did not know what it meant. Was it to expand <br />diversity and to make certain a facility met the widest range of diversity? <br /> <br />Ms. Stern felt that might be a good wording. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern felt it meant diverse needs of the community, not the diversity of a <br />person. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky then commented on Program 28.4 and felt the word "sufficienf should be <br />removed. He agreed the items regarding the School District should be reviewed by the School <br />Board and further review of the land use should be done before the District develops <br />demographics tables. <br /> <br />Ms. Stern indicated staff planned to give the School Board the preliminary preferred plan <br />for review. She indicated the demographic projections are slightly different than what the city is <br />doing. The School Board is looking at changes in generation rates of units when there are <br />fewer units being built and there are replacements of families in older tracts. That is where the <br />changes take place rather than in terms of where the homes are or how many. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan believed one of the action items from the joint meeting with the School <br />Board was to do another demographic study based on the Land Use Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho said staff would provide the Preferred Land Use and the two alternatives and <br />they would give input regarding their preference. The District would confirm the student <br />generation based on the preferred alternative. Even though one may disagree with some <br />conclusions of the demographer's report, it provides good background information in terms of <br />what is happening to the population. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern felt that section should be a little more generic and should let the <br />community know the School District does demographic statistics yearly and sets their priorities <br />for schools based on those figures. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky felt the General Plan should reference the District study and not include it <br />in the General Plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho felt it depended on what Council felt the General Plan should be. For <br />someone new to the community, it gave a snapshot of what is happening in the community from <br />a demographic standpoint. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky pointed out the District updated the demographics more often than the city <br />does its General Plan. That is why he did not want the document as part of the Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern felt when the city talks about smaller units, more condominiums or rental <br />apartments, it definitely affects the demographer's report. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky referred to discussion about adding a Water Element and believed the <br />direction has been set for the General Plan and it has taken a long time to get to this point. He <br />did not support changing the process or adding more review cycles that would increase the time <br />to get the General Plan. He agreed and disagreed with various parts of the Ahwanhee <br /> <br />General Plan Workshop <br />City Council <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />OS/23/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.