My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN042506
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN042506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
4/20/2006 2:30:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/25/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN042506
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />which meant he could get five residential units. If the General Plan is changed to say that <br />slopes greater than 25% are not counted, then Mr. Eliason can only build two units. That is <br />unnecessary, because there is a seven-acre flat at the end of Blessing Drive, where five units <br />could be built, and it would be a change from what the General Plan has ever read. <br /> <br />Joseph Cunningham 3599 Carlsbad Court, thanked Council and Planning Commission <br />for their many hours of work. He presented a letter for the record from Connie Cox to the City <br />Manager. She thanked him for meeting with the Vice President of the Valley Trails <br />Homeowners Association and noted that neighbors do not want homes put on the Evangelical <br />Church property. She noted the Homeowners Association is a voluntary organization and did <br />not have the staff or time to continued to fight the proposals of the church. This battle was <br />fought eight years ago and it seems like they are starting all over again. She asked Council to <br />reject the proposal from the church and Ponderosa Homes and fix the contradictory zoning, so <br />this issue does not come up again. There is clearly a church on the property and it should have <br />been zoned public and institutional thirty years ago, when it moved in. Mr. Cunningham echoed <br />her comments. <br /> <br />Brian Myers, Hanson Aggregates, 3000 Busch Road, indicated Hanson was a large <br />property owner on the east side of Pleasanton. It ceased its operations at the site in 2003 and <br />since that time has been removing equipment and reclaiming the site. It also dedicated a <br />significant portion of the site to Zone 7 for the lakes. In 2003, Hanson submitted concept plans <br />for the site for various land uses that are largely industrial and commercial office uses. He <br />asked that the General Plan address those land uses specifically rather than address the site as <br />a future specific plan area. When Hanson submitted its application in 2003, it was told it should <br />go along with the General Plan process to see what the community had to say about land uses <br />for the property. He asked that Council give specific direction about what to do with the property <br />and noted that a letter had been submitted requesting industrial and commercial land uses for <br />the site. <br /> <br />John Rennels, Bay Area Rapid Transit District, 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1631, <br />Oakland, indicated he was pleased to announce that BART had closed on the private <br />development component of the future West Pleasanton/Dublin Station, which guaranteed a <br />permanent parking structure in Pleasanton for the station, if it is built. He acknowledged the <br />work of staff on the staff report, which presented scenarios for an attractive mixed-use <br />residential development at the future station. He was concerned that options A3, A4, and Bl do <br />not take advantage of the adjacency to transit, but he looked forward to the private development <br />partner to create a first class development that everyone would be proud of and be an attractive <br />gateway to the community. <br /> <br />Eric Heffner, Windstar Communities, 11149 No. Torrey Pines Road, #250, La Jolla, <br />California, indicated his company is in a long-term ground lease with BART for the site and <br />proposes to build rental apartments in a mixed-use transit-oriented development. There will be <br />retail uses, including convenience stores. He noted BRE is an outstanding firm and is well <br />aware of transit-oriented development. He felt Pleasanton was in an outstanding position <br />because it will have two BART stations in the community and should do its best to maximize <br />both developments. He believed his site had an advantage because it was on the ring road at <br />Stone ridge Mall. The residents could get off the train, go home and then to the mall for <br />entertainment or the restaurants. The traffic impacts are reduced from what would normally <br />occur from an office building. An office building traffic generation equates to 450 units and his <br />company only wants 350 units. That is the minimum to make the project successful and he <br />noted there would also meet the affordable housing requirements the city is requesting. <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />04/25/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.