My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN042506
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN042506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:44 AM
Creation date
4/20/2006 2:30:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/25/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN042506
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />should consider where any units over the housing cap could be placed. She believed most <br />emphasis should be on transit-oriented development in Hacienda. <br /> <br />Sean Lemoine, 4574 River Rock Hill Road, referred to his family's property on the west <br />side of Foothill Road and asked how the General Plan Update would affect it. It has zoning for <br />26 units even though they don't plan to max out to that. But they want to build homes for their <br />families and again asked how the General Plan Updated would affect that. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman said that would be discussed in the future. No action at this meeting <br />would shackle any potential future development proposal the Lemoine family may have for its <br />property. Even if the 25% slope rule is approved, there is still opportunity for Council to use its <br />discretion. <br /> <br />Mr. Lemoine asked if staff has done a fiscal analysis of the impacts of reduced <br />development on the west side of Foothill Road? <br /> <br />David Pastor, 3615 Hawaii Court South, believed that the impact from the church <br />property development would not be from a house or two in a 40-year old neighborhood. This <br />would be a group of new homes that would impact up to six courts in Valley Trails which would <br />end within 50 yards of the new development. He felt the biggest problem of a new <br />neighborhood is from the elevation above the old neighborhood. The surrounding neighborhood <br />will be looking up at whatever is developed and he did not think Ponderosa Homes would build <br />1,400 to 1,600 sq. ft. homes there, which is what comprises most of the neighborhood. He <br />believed there would be bigger homes at a high elevation in the center of the old community and <br />he felt it would be like a castle on the rock. Further, he believed the housing would limit the <br />view of the park and church. He asked if there was something in the church bylaws about <br />selling the property for profit? <br /> <br />Joe Seto, Zone 7 Water Agency, indicated Zone 7 was interested in the development of <br />the Staples Ranch area. The stream management master plan, which looks at the future of <br />flood control in the Valley recommends regional storage in the quarry pits instead of a <br />channelization approach, which means moving the water as quickly as possible out of the <br />Valley. The area in Staples Ranch has been identified as a critical area for flood control. Zone <br />7 is looking forward to talking to regional agencies for partnering on this regional flood control <br />approach. <br /> <br />Kevin Close, 871 Sycamore Road, commented the staff report mentions this would be <br />the last land use workshop and asked if there was to be a land use workshop regarding the <br />southeast hills and south Pleasanton. He asked if the number of units discussed for that area <br />were part of the Housing Element? Were the health and safety and geological issues on the <br />west side of Happy Valley to be a regional decision or would it be citywide in the General Plan? <br />Will the number of units in the southeast hills be revisited to reflect changes? <br /> <br />Vanessa Kawaihau, 871 Sycamore Road, indicated last April the City Council adopted <br />as a priority the south Pleasanton open space preservation. Since that time, it was indicated <br />there would be a committee formed among the three property owners, the developers and the <br />community surrounding the three developments of about 350 homes. Staff reports and Council <br />comments indicate the discussions involve only one developer and one community, which is to <br />be a prototype for the other two developments. In a previous land use workshop, it was stated <br />that 150 homes from these three future developments in the southeast Pleasanton hills could be <br />transferred, but it was not stated where they would be transferred or from which development. <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City CounciVPlanning Commission <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />04/25/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.