CCMIN042506 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Iserson said the maximum under the density the property has now could accommodate 26 units, however the midpoint is 14 units. They have developed 13 units, so potentially they have 13 units under the existing residential designation that they mayor may not get approval for. Ms. McGovern asked if staff had seen any plan for development on the Westbrook property? Mr. Iserson replied that a preliminary conceptual drawing had been submitted for 21 units. The midpoint for that property is four units. Ms. McGovern was concerned about the Joel property and asked if it was designated as agricultural and grazing? Mr. Iserson answered that it was Rural Density Residential and agriculture. Ms. McGovern did not think anyone should be able to tell Ms. Joel that she cannot have cattle grazing on her property. She wanted to keep land for grazing where possible and she asked staff to do whatever it could to help Ms. Joel. She referred to comments by Mr. Close about the southeast hills and the south Pleasanton plan and asked if there were any plans for development other than the Spotorno and Oak Ridge properties? Mr. Iserson said there were no plans at the present time for the Foley property and it is not in the city. Ms. McGovern clarified that there are no units in reserve for that area. Mr. Iserson replied that staff assumes the existing General Plan will remain the same there. Mr. Fialho indicated there are four properties: Foley, Spotorno, Oak Grove and Lund. All of them have land use designations in the existing 1996 General Plan. There is a triangular piece of the Foley property that is inside the urban growth boundary that has designation for 15 units. Ms. McGovern asked if the density is decreased for any of those three properties, could it be held for the Foley's property? Mr. Fialho said in theory, if the density is reduced from the current land use designation, it would have to be moved somewhere. Any of these properties are receiver points for those units, which then allows a transfer of more units into the reserve. Ms. McGovern asked about the number of square feet of office space that Hacienda is approved to build and thought it was about 2.5 million sq. ft. Mr. Iserson said that is about right and acknowledged there is an entitlement under the Development Agreement that has not yet been built. Ms. McGovern asked if that square footage was included when any traffic models were run? Joint Workshop City CounciVPlanning Commission 14 04/25/06