CCMIN030106 - Laserfiche WebLink

preferred to keep the property in public and institutional zoning instead of changing it to residential. Ryan Richardson, 3621 Virgin Islands Court, agreed with the prior speaker and preferred to keep the church property as public and institutional. He would not object to a school, but did not want thirty homes or townhouses. He felt there should be a complete analysis of how much land is left for this in Pleasanton. Bob Slack, 6900 Valley Trails Drive, pastor of the Evangelical Free Church, said there is no plan to build condos or town homes. He said the desire is to upgrade the existing church facility and to make it more energy efficient and more environmentally and aesthetically pleasing with more trees and less grass. The church wants to stay in that location and be a benefit to the community. Improvements would make a better place for weddings to occur and there would be benefits for the church because it would not be spending so much time, energy and funds to maintain the church. The request is to reserve 25-30 units to be reserved against the housing cap so that the church can convert six acres into a resource that could be used to maintain the three acres the church would keep and use to the benefit of the community. He said they had enlisted the help of Ponderosa Homes and a respected architectural firm to design a project amenable to all parties and of benefit to everybody. Monty Bindra, 8319 Regency Drive, said Pleasanton Ridge is very special and adds much to the city and residents of Laguna Oaks. He requested if the properties west of Foothill Road are designated RDR (rural density residential) that they remain in that zoning. He also requested that any property of 25% slope be kept out of the calculation for density. He noted a development on flat land has a different impact than one built on a slope. Regarding the Austin property, which has an application for eight units, he preferred that the property remain RDR and that there be no general plan amendment to increase density through other means such as affordable housing. He felt five units would be acceptable for that area. Joe Cunningham, 3599 Carlsbad Court, said there had been past efforts to put homes on the church property and the Valley Trails Homeowners Association has always been opposed to it. The Association has tried to work with the church and has not been successful. The Association wants the land to remain public and institutional. He noted the St. Claire church needed more land to expand; yet the Evangelical Church wants to reduce its size. Perhaps these two churches should cooperate. He asked if the Evangelical Church land has been tax free, do those back taxes have to be paid if the land is sold and is no longer public and institutional? Susan Bovee, 4417 Valley Avenue, said she owns a townhouse next to the Guesthouse Inn and she felt her property was a buffer zone or feathering between the apartments behind them and the single-family homes next to them. She did not understand how 37 units in that small area could have any feathering or how that many units could be built in that tiny space. Gill Woodruff, 8053 Horizons Court, indicated he lived in the Moller Ranch area east of the Joel property. He believed there were currently three units on that property and a proposal to add four additional units. The gated road to the existing three units is on a steep slope and the noise is of concern to him. He did not want the zoning to be increased from the RDR level. He said his primary concern was the access to the area and the steepness of some of the roads. Joint Workshop City Council/Planning Commission 6 03/01/06