CCMIN030106 - Laserfiche WebLink

made sense to rezone areas yet. He agreed the BART station was a good place for higher density housing. It is an advantage that the property is on the 1-680 corridor, which makes it easier for commuters up and down that corridor. He did not think it was necessary to have a grocery store in the area. There are other parts of town, such as where he lives, with no services and that doesn't seem to be a problem. He agreed some kind of convenience store would be sufficient. Another advantage is the fact that this development would provide a parking structure for the BART station, which is much needed. He then referred to the Knuppe property and indicated he did not want to change what is approved for the site. If the developer wants to reduce density, it can make the proposal and work with the community, but he reiterated they have a pre-approved plan. He was uncertain what to do with the Church property. He could see some housing that fits in with the existing neighborhood, but could also see potential for a Habitat for Humanity site. Instead of requiring inclusionary housing, he suggested the Church donate some land next to the site for a Habitat for Humanity project. This is the best type of low-income housing and he felt it would fit in with that neighborhood. He wanted a better description of what the Church is planning. Is it six acres to be sold, keeping three acres for the Church? Or could the Church keep three acres, two for public and institutional and another part for residential. Regarding the Guesthouse Inn, he did not support high density residential in that location. He wanted something to fit with the existing neighborhood that was single story. He supported Ms. Roberts's suggestion about hillside residential zoning for the Foothill area and then review what would make sense for the area in lower elevations. Mayor Hosterman believed it was premature to talk about specific projects. She was more interested in discussing broader policy objectives at this point. She appreciated Mr. Hirst for coming to the meeting to review the Austin and Yee proposals. She was excited about the BART station proposal and felt it should be a true transit oriented development. However, at this time, the proposal is for 350 units between the BART station and the mall and in compensation, the city gets a parking structure now rather than five years from now. There needs to be more review of the actual project. Regarding the Church site, she could accept homes in one fashion or another on that property. However, she felt thirty units were too many. From what she had heard, she believed there would not be a lot of opposition from the neighbors depending upon what the homes looked like. She acknowledged concerns about building structures where people could look into existing yards, but if a project is brought forward with something less than thirty units and on a case by case basis, it may be possible to develop something that would give the congregation the funds to upgrade their existing facility. As far as all the other listed properties, on a broad-based discussion, she would be interested in talking further about re-instituting the 25% slope rule and then looking at the changed numbers. Then allow each property owner as an application is submitted to make the argument that additional units would not have an adverse impact on the land or on the community. If there is a compelling argument, they may get Council support. She then referred to the concept raised by Ms. McGovern, that instead of designating land use for the entire city and using up all of the housing cap units, that a certain number of units be set aside for consideration by future generations. It could be 200 or 400 units. She asked Council if it was willing to direct staff to include that in the picture for the final review on March 28. She liked the idea for the future populations of a changing community to make those determinations. Mr. Brozosky thought Council had already discussed this reserve and would decide at the end of the workshops what the number should be. Joint Workshop City Council/Planning Commission 20 03/01/06