My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030706
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN030706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:43 AM
Creation date
3/3/2006 9:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030706
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />community needs standpoint, Council needed to look at maximizing affordable housing not <br />maximizing credits that would exempt affordable housing. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was taken as follows: <br />AYES: Council members - Brozosky, McGovern, Thorne, and Mayor Hosterman <br />NOES: Council member Sullivan <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAINED: None <br /> <br />6d <br />Authorization to issue a reauest for aualifications (RFQ) to conduct a structural <br />feasibility analvsis for eXDandina the Pleasanton Library Buildina. (SR 06:075) <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian and Julie Farnsworth, Director of Library Services, presented the staff report. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if the analysis would include the possibility of moving Old Bernal <br />Avenue to the San Francisco Water District property, which would provide a larger contiguous <br />site. <br /> <br />Based upon Phase I of the Civic Center Master Plan, Mr. Bocian said relocating the <br />street would be difficult. A consultant was hired as part of the Phase I process to consider two <br />options: the closure of Old Bernal Avenue to provide one contiguous site and the potential to <br />relocate Old Bernal Avenue. The closure of Old Bernal Avenue was not an option and <br />relocating it was extremely difficult to get the appropriate curvature in the street would not <br />provide any additional land. He reminded Council that the City does not own the San Francisco <br />Water District site. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern asked if Council was considering the cost to construct a parking garage? <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian said not necessarily which is why he indicated that staff might need to revisit <br />the Civic Center site. The focus will be on the expansion of the current Library building, the cost <br />and identifying other issues, one of which will be how the expansion of the Library will impact <br />parking and identifying how this issue will be resolved. He did not believe the analysis would <br />get into the details of a parking structure. The reason for including the parking structure in the <br />Phase I Civic Center Master Plan was because of the connection to the Downtown Specific Plan <br />that addressed additional parking on the Civic Center site. The Specific Plan also discussed an <br />expanded City Hall building and additional parking that is needed. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern asked if the analysis would include the minimal amount of space that the <br />Library would need to have including increasing the amount of volumes per capita, but not <br />including other amenities. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho suggested that staff approach the feasibility analysis with the maximum <br />square footage in mind which will determine the ultimate potential layout for the property and <br />take into consideration all of the maximum associated impacts. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern was hopeful this analysis would include more than one option. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />18 <br /> <br />03/07/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.