My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN030706
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN030706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:43 AM
Creation date
3/3/2006 9:03:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/7/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN030706
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Bocian said staff maintains an interest list. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern asked if Council could be apprised of the cost, including the Affordable <br />By Design units, when these units went on the market for sale? <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian said yes. <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne referred to the limited preference criteria and noted that Council discussed <br />the possibility of allowing a preference for applicants raised in the community wanting to return <br />to Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian clarified that the two categories mentioned in the staff report were strictly <br />related to the Affordable By Design Units. For the affordable units, the preference category <br />system is more detailed. Notwithstanding that, there is no preference for returning children or <br />residents in town. The preference category is based upon continuance residency in <br />Pleasanton, except that there is an alternative to the preference system for someone who went <br />away to school and returned or if someone recently moved. A preference for applicants raised <br />in the community wanting to return to Pleasanton could be included but he believed it would be <br />difficult to monitor. <br /> <br />Mr. Roush said Council ultimately decides what it wants to apply and if there were <br />Council support to revisit the preference system, Council could refer the matter to the Housing <br />Commission for its review and recommendation. <br /> <br />Mr. Thorne referred to Attachment B, Section 2F and asked if there was a review <br />process for a hardship exception that might not be categorized? <br /> <br />Mr. Bocian said no. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman invited public comments. <br /> <br />John McMorrow, representing SilverStone Communities, thanked staff for its efforts in <br />making this agreement right to provide affordable housing to the City. <br /> <br />If Council removed the restriction that the exterior and interior finishes, landscaping and <br />amenities including appliances, carpeting, electrical fixtures, hardware countertops, etc. for the <br />Affordable By Design Units do not have to be consistent with the remainder of the units in the <br />Project, Mr. Brozosky asked if SilverStone Communities could produce a unit that is cheaper? <br /> <br />Mr. McMorrow said SilverStone Communities typically has this flexibility. The restriction <br />that the exterior and interior finishes are to be of the same quality for the Affordable By Design <br />Units as the remainder of the units would tie SilverStone Community's hands in bringing the <br />price down because it is not clear as to what it can and cannot do. <br /> <br />If this restriction were removed, Ms. McGovern inquired about the difference in price for <br />the Affordable By Design Units. <br /> <br />Mr. McMorrow said the decrease in cost would be approximately $10,000 to $12,000. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />03/07/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.