CCMIN112905 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Arkin said yes. He wanted to build fewer traditional single-family homes, especially in the hills. He did not want homes built in environmentally sensitive areas, but in areas with the least impact to existing residents, such as the type of development for transit oriented areas. He believed many people wanted the housing cap reduced. He wanted more discussion by Council about reducing the housing cap and bringing it back to the voters for approval. He felt the reason people wanted this is because of traffic. Mary Roberts agreed with most of what Mr. Arkin and Ms. Fox said. She believed the proposed assisted living facility on Staples is different than what has happened in Pleasanton before. She wished to find a nexus for how to count the units. She felt it was clear 65 units could be counted, but she was not willing to go as far as Mr. Arkin. She was intrigued by the suggestion of Ms. McGovern that some units be reserved under the housing cap for the next General Plan. She did not think people understood enough about where the community was headed in the next ten years to tie up all remaining units. She felt something great may come up, such as a green development, and there ought to be 300-500 units set aside for some unforeseen plan. She did not agree with the concept of a jobslhousing balance. She remembered when the Hacienda Business Park was being planned and the statements that Pleasanton was the perfect place for it because it had a well-educated population that was underemployed. Things changed. She believed that people did not want to be required to live in the same city where they worked. She referred to the idea of reducing fees for smaller units, but she felt if the transportation fee were reduced for a 1,200 sq. ft. house, the residents will use the streets as much as anyone else. She said there was a need to find more ways to encourage smaller houses and felt that is something the Planning Commission can do case by case. Jennifer Pearce did not think a jobs/housing balance could be legislated, but it could be encouraged. It would be an ideal community where the majority of the residents lived and worked in the city. She felt anything to improve bike trails; use of public transportation, and mixed-use facilities such as the Hacienda project is worth reviewing. When people live and work in the city they spend their commuting time investing in the community. With regard to the housing on Staples Ranch, she was loath to call anything housing that can't be deemed affordable in one-way or another. She was encouraged by the fact that staff is talking to the developer to figure out a way to make part of these units affordable. Jerry Thorne referred to the Staples Ranch project and felt that the existence of a kitchen or a driveway should not determine whether or not something should be counted under the housing cap. He felt the key is that this is a congregate facility where meals are served and it has very little impact on infrastructure, traffic or schools. Personally, he did not think any of the units should be counted. If Council felt the 65 units should be counted, he would go along with them, but personally he did not want to count anything else. As far as the growth management goals, policies and programs, he supported the staff recommendations and agreed that Program 14.4 should be replaced with a directive to staff to include a reduction in the frequency of reports and Joint Workshop City Council/Planning Commission 12 11/29/05