Laserfiche WebLink
<br />which will impact favorably other housing in the city not controlled by the market. She <br />believed it was possible to set requirements in affordable housing for the residents to <br />work in the city. Council can set requirements for the residents in affordable housing in <br />a way that is not possible in the open market place. This would be for those just starting <br />in the community, who serve the community and who would otherwise have to travel <br />long distances in order to find housing they can afford. As Council considers things like <br />reserving housing units or whether or not to count living facilities licensed as assisted <br />living as housing, keep in mind all these have impacts on the city's ability to provide this <br />special kind of housing that is missing. She was concerned about driving choices to <br />smaller houses in an attempt to make them affordable, but she felt restricting the size <br />was not the answer. There needs to be city investment in the production of the housing <br />and in deciding who will live there based on income. She referred to Ms. McGovern's <br />suggestion of investing in silent second mortgages for existing housing and said it was a <br />good idea, but the problem is that is very costly for the number of units you get for that <br />type of subsidy. The most efficient use of the city's affordable housing funds comes in <br />the apartment format where there is the greatest opportunity to provide units that are all <br />the same but to subsidize a certain number of them. That is the most bang for the buck. <br /> <br />Dolores Bengtson, 568 Hamilton Way, referred to the question of whether to <br />count the units on Staples Ranch towards the housing cap. She believed the criterion <br />to be used is licensing. If all units are subject to licensing, then every resident qualifies <br />for assisted living and would meet certain criterion for living skills they can no longer <br />achieve. That is very different from Ridge View Commons. It is not a licensed facility. <br />She thought that all units on Staples that are subject to licensing should not count <br />toward the housing cap. <br /> <br />There were no further speakers. <br /> <br />3. ACTION ITEMS CONCERNING GENERAL PLAN UPDATE: LAND USE <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky did not believe a person had to meet the requirements for assisted <br />living to get into the Staples facility. He thought anyone who could afford it could move <br />in. <br /> <br />Mr. Ashenbrenner said a person would be entering a self-insured pool regulated <br />by the State of California. In many states, it is regulated by the Insurance Department. <br />The people have to qualify three ways: there must be a certain level of health when <br />they come in. That is not because it is an independent living community. The State of <br />California has decided that it must be licensed and operable as an assisted living <br />community. The reason there must be a certain level of health when they come in is <br />because there is an element of the project that is insurance. The people are provided <br />assisted living and skilled nursing care for the rest of their life at essentially no extra <br />cost. If many people come into the new project with Alzheimer's, for instance, there is a <br />non-viable self-insured pool. The point is, it's insurance, it's services and a place to live <br />all in one package. It is regulated like, insurance and under the law, it is all assisted <br />living. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Special Meeting <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />11/29/05 <br />