Laserfiche WebLink
<br />of the housing cap. This is particularly important with regard to housing for very low- <br />income residents. Pleasanton is far short of its goal. The city has met its obligation for <br />moderate and low-income housing, but has produced three times the amount of housing <br />for high-end families. She noted there are 850 units of assisted living and skilled <br />nursing units under consideration, and hoped Council would review the workforce <br />required to staff such a facility based on licensing. She felt many employees would be <br />required and many of those are paid minimum wages. They will require very low <br />income housing, unless it is expected they will commute from Tracy or Manteca. Their <br />real need will further exacerbate the unmet need for low-income residents in <br />Pleasanton. <br /> <br />Becky Dennis, 838 Gray Fox Circle, also spoke on behalf of Citizens for a Caring <br />Community. She referred to the assisted living units and urged that Council not count <br />the 65 units of house-like development towards the housing cap. She felt they couldn't <br />be treated as housing because they cannot meet the affordability requirements without <br />challenging the business plan of the operator. It makes more sense from a planning <br />standpoint to reserve development potential that will help the city meet its very low <br />income housing needs. <br /> <br />Kevin Close, 871 Sycamore Road, did not believe affordable units should be <br />counted towards the housing cap because it would affect the city's ability to bring in <br />lower income housing. He asked how the infrastructure capacity for sewer and water <br />was calculated for a development of this size? <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman said that question has not been answered because the project <br />is only in the discussion phase at this point. <br /> <br />There were no other speakers. <br /> <br />4. NEXT STEPS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL OR COMMISSION <br /> <br />Trish Maas asked how impact fees would be assessed for the Staples Ranch <br />project? <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson said the question of impact fees and infrastructure are addressed in <br />the Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan, which includes a financing component for the <br />property owners in the specific plan area, including Staples Ranch. <br /> <br />Ms. Maas asked if the fees were different if it were a business or commercial <br />project? <br /> <br />Mr. Iserson said assisted living facilities are subject to residential fee structures, <br />but in the case of Staples Ranch there is a special financing program that was devised <br />and will be reexamined and adjusted. In the past, assisted living facilities have been <br />assessed residential fees even though they have not been considered as housing units. <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission <br /> <br />9 <br /> <br />11/29/05 <br />