My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN012406
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
CCMIN012406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:43 AM
Creation date
1/20/2006 1:40:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/24/2006
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN012406
NOTES
Joint Workshop
NOTES 3
Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Stern said the formal scoping ends at the close of the meeting on January 30. To a <br />large extent, this is to notify agencies about the preparation of an EIR so they can make sure <br />they submit written comments about what kind of analysis they want included. It is a public <br />meeting, but generally staff receives more formal responses from agencies than the public on <br />this kind of scoping meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky felt it was a cart before the horse situation. At this workshop no decision <br />was made on whether the east Pleasanton area would be a study area or specific plan. How <br />would an outside agency like Zone 7, Dublin, Livermore or Alameda County know what to <br />comment on? <br /> <br />Ms. Stern said in the notice of preparation of an EIR staff identified those potential areas <br />of change. If one were a neighbor of one of those areas or an agency with an interest in those <br />areas, then you would be notified that there is something going on and could express an interest <br />in the analysis. <br /> <br />Mr. Brozosky said they would have to go through the process even though Council may <br />decide not to include the area in the General Plan but to put it into a study area for a future <br />specific plan. He was concerned the agencies would have to go through more work than was <br />necessary. <br /> <br />5. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br />There being no further discussion, the joint workshop was adjourned at 9:44 p.m. <br /> <br />(Ft!~~ <br /> <br />awn Abraha~.il <br />City Clerk <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission <br /> <br />17 <br /> <br />01/24/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.