Laserfiche WebLink
<br />can be discussed along with the impacts on the schools. He felt that had been left out so far. <br />He believed more study was necessary and he was unwilling to commit to anything at this time. <br /> <br />Matt Sullivan agreed with the concept of a specific plan for this area, but wondered if <br />staff needed options for land use, whether residential on the east side, Hacienda or West Dublin <br />BART station. He felt there were assumptions that needed to be made before narrowing the <br />land use options and circulation element. He asked staff if they were able to do that based on <br />what has been discussed so far? <br /> <br />Nelson Fialho believed staff could do that, but there were many options to be studied. <br />The big assumptions could be tested by bringing them back to Council in this kind of forum to <br />determine if staff had the right level of housing and commercial, so that when staff prepares the <br />traffic models for the various options that the assumptions are accurate. <br /> <br />Mr. Sullivan said he had heard very good comments and he agreed with most of them. <br />The specific plan concept needed to be tied with the long-term build out economic study, which <br />is in progress by the Economic Vitality Committee. For it to be fiscally sustainable beyond <br />build out, we need to look at what kind of land use helps the city to do that. For instance, <br />industrial versus retail, to see what long term options make the most sense. He would like to <br />have more information on the ACE train plans to see how that may impact some of the <br />decisions made here. That affects the residential development. If it is truly transit oriented, <br />there must be some kind of transit in close proximity. The BART station and ACE train station <br />are not in close proximity. Regarding industrial development, he felt it makes sense to have <br />diversity in the economy. Pleasanton has a lot of office and service commercial already, but <br />perhaps there is some light industrial options left for development that would add diversity in the <br />economy and the jobs in the community. Those could be higher paying jobs than typical office <br />or retail establishments. He liked the idea of some kind of education campus. He also liked the <br />comments about trails and wanted further discussions with the East Bay Regional Park District <br />and Zone 7. He was concerned about recreational uses at a lake that is half dried up at times. <br />If there is a connection between Shadow Cliffs and Cope Lake, perhaps water could be shared <br />between those two lakes. Regarding residential development, there are a limited number of <br />units left under the housing cap and we need to decide what we want to do that makes sense <br />for the community from a needs standpoint. There are issues of affordability as well as the <br />income diversity of the population. Environmental impacts, infrastructure to be built and <br />maintained and effects on transportation are all important factors. It may make sense to put <br />these units in a true transit oriented development like Hacienda Business Park. Council needs <br />to be very careful how it plans these last remaining units. In the future, this could be a place for <br />the 200-500 units set aside for the future, once the quarries are reclaimed, although there would <br />be some limitation due to the Airport Protection Area near the lakes. He was not certain there <br />could be true lake front living. He agreed with Anne Fox regarding the northern Parcel G being <br />a natural buffer between the lakes and the park that is currently contemplated for Staples <br />Ranch. <br /> <br />Mr. Fialho indicated staff would compile the requested information and come back with <br />options to allow a broader look at the community to get a big picture. That would allow the <br />group to contemplate the distribution of the units in multiple ways, including identifying this as a <br />potential study area that might have some residential mixed with commerciaVoffice/industrial. <br /> <br />Ms. McGovern was concerned about always using the midpoint for residential density. It <br />tends to give entitlements that then have to be addressed by density transfers. <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council/Planning Commission <br /> <br />13 <br /> <br />01/24/06 <br />