Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Brozosky was concerned that the City was conducting testing of the baseline and <br />looking for what the City might be contributing to the aquifers and if multiple individuals are <br />having failed septic systems, there should be some why of monitoring them so that if the <br />baseline changes, the City can tell if it is related to the Golf Course or the septic tanks in that <br />area. He realized this area was private property but believed it was a health and safety matter <br />that went beyond this property, which would affect other individuals. <br /> <br />Mr. Roush said when staff conducted testing of wells on private property, it provided the <br />results to those property owners so they could see what staff discovered which might trigger a <br />conversation between them and their neighbors in terms of what might be causing this. The <br />consultants staff hired recognized and will analyze if additional contaminates are found, whether <br />those were attributed from the Golf Course as opposed to coming from an adjacent leach field. <br /> <br />Mayor Hosterman declared the public hearing open. <br /> <br />Jerry Wagner, appellant, noted in the 1970's, Alameda County put a building moratorium <br />into effect on the Happy Valley/North Sycamore areas of south Pleasanton because the well <br />water was polluted with nitrates. The City has annexed the north Sycamore area land and <br />allowed developers to develop the land on the closed aquifer and under the Alameda County <br />moratorium. He expressed concern about the nitrate ground water contamination on this site as <br />it related to the closed aquifer. He believed the size of the house violated the Happy Valley <br />Specific Plan and would further pollute the closed aquifer. He noted that the public hearing <br />notice for this matter indicated the house was 6,785 square feet with a 992 square-foot garage <br />for a total of 7,777 square feet. He believed the size of the custom home and garage should be <br />reduced to blend in with the other homes in the Happy Valley area. He referred to Exhibit B of <br />the staff report and noted that there were no colored building elevations and perspectives of the <br />proposal taken from two viewpoints looking toward the front of the elevation from the westerly <br />road and looking towards the rear from the present end of Club House Drive as listed in Item 10 <br />of the Conditions of Approval, which did not make this a complete report. <br /> <br />Terry Townsend, project architect and representing the applicant David Ouartaroli, <br />referred to the Mariposa Ranch Design Guidelines which are provided to the homeowners in the <br />Mariposa Ranch development by the Callippe Preserve Golf Course and are the guidelines that <br />the architects and City staff are using to determine compliance for the project. He noted there is <br />a mandatory threshold of 50 Green Building points that the buildings are required to attain and <br />this project is exceeding this threshold. Green Building techniques that are being incorporated <br />into this project are: job site material recycling, high efficiency irrigation systems, engineered <br />lumber in the construction of Energy Star appliances, gradient barrier roof sheathing, high <br />efficiency windows, low VOC paints and pre-wiring for photovoltaic cells for the future. He <br />mentioned that all of the lots in Tract 7372 are to be hooked up to City water and sewer <br />systems. The groundwater contamination has been a problem long before Mr. Ouartaroli <br />purchased his lot and he believed staff would agree that the construction of the proposed home <br />would have little if any effect on the current situation. The original square footage numbers <br />were preliminary numbers when the applicant had conversation with staff in regard to the <br />garage square footage credit of 600 square feet, which is a credit that has been assigned to <br />numerous projects in different areas in Pleasanton and the original proposal, concluded a six- <br />car garage, which was 600 square feet larger. He and staff found that 600 square feet was not <br />allowed in a certain case and was a maximum that was assigned to the design guidelines. The <br />applicant has trimmed this out and the numbers mentioned by the previous speaker of 7,777 <br />square feet for the overall building square footage has been constant and was the same number <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council <br />Minutes <br /> <br />16 <br /> <br />1 1/1 5/05 <br />