Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Stanley. There is room to build a second bridge adjacent to it to make a four-lane road. The bridge to <br />the right of that is what they call the Vulcan Bridge, which will always be a private road. In between <br />those two bridges is where the Arroyo Mocho comes out from the south. There is a Zone 7 <br />maintenance road along the northerly side of the arroyo which dips down under those two bridges and <br />is designed to be a regional trail so people don't have to walk across the heavily traveled quarry <br />property. That is also in Livermore's plans and has been reviewed by regional trail groups. <br />Ms. McGovern asked that the proposed trail be designated on any future plan drawings. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked if the senior care facility would be constructed in phases? He did not think <br />the first occupants would necessarily need the skilled nursing facilities right away. <br />Mr. Aschenbrenner said people who move into units with kitchens wanted to know that the <br />skilled nursing is available as soon as possible. The plan is to have them not later than six months <br />after the kitchen units are occupied. That will be built in the first phase, however it is sized to meet the <br />actuarially determined needs of the entire population. Until that need is realized, those assisted living <br />and skilled nursing facilities would be available to the public. He believed it would take four phases to <br />build out the kitchen units. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked how ABAG counted these units. Were they counted as housing units <br />toward the regional needs goals? <br />Mr. Iserson said there are state criteria and definitions and as long as they are met the assisted <br />living units can be applied toward Pleasanton's fair share housing needs; even though the city may not <br />count them as part of its housing towards the housing cap. <br />Mr. Brozosky clarified that it would be possible to have a 29,000 housing unit cap, but the state <br />would see more units than 29,000 the way they count all the units. <br />Mr. Iserson said that was correct. <br />Mr. Brozosky then referred to the number of units left to reach the housing cap. 871 units are <br />left in the General Plan and if they are not built to the mid point of density, then some properties would <br />have to be down zoned and units moved to another location. <br />Ms. Stern said that was correct because under new state laws if density is reduced, the units <br />must be moved to another location rather than eliminated entirely. <br />Mr. Sullivan referred to the EVA and wanted to make certain the location could be moved. <br />Mr. Iserson said that was correct. When the actual proposal is presented with roads and <br />driveways, a review would be done by the fire department to make certain the equipment can negotiate <br />the various EVA. <br />Mr. Sullivan referred to the idea of taking this property out of the General Plan update process <br />and moving it along on a parallel track. He noted the decision on whether Stoneridge Drive is extended <br />is still in the General Plan update process and is separate from the approvals on these properties. <br />Joint Workshop <br />City CounciVPlanning Commission 7 10/11/05 <br />