My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101105
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN101105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
10/14/2005 10:07:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/11/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN101105
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Stern said all of the first five (Kottinger Place, Ridgeview Commons, Division Street, Stanley <br />Junction and Pleasanton Gardens) are affordable on some level; either moderate, low or very low. The <br />Gardens at Ironwood have 138 affordable units. <br />Jennifer Pearce asked about the substantial entrance fee for the proposed development. <br />Mr. Cook said people pay two ways, an entrance fee and a monthly fee. The entrance fees <br />range from $200,000 to $800,000. Most people will sell a house and use a portion of the proceeds for <br />the entrance fee. There are many things being provided. Most people who come to this development <br />either cannot get long term care insurance or it is very expensive. <br />Ms. Pearce asked about the length of the emergency vehicle access road. She thought it was <br />about 900 feet. <br />Mr. Cook said it was actually about 800 feet. That has not yet been designed and is dependent <br />upon the requirements of the emergency vehicles and the surrounding development of the auto mall. <br />Trish Maas asked how closely the senior facility and car dealership is tied in the application? <br />Mr. Iserson said these are tied very closely. <br />Mr. Cook explained that the property is unincorporated and there must be an application to <br />LAFCO (Local Agency Formation Commission). LAFCO's rules indicated a property must be rezoned <br />before annexation and the zoning must stay in place for two years. The developers want to go into the <br />city knowing what is going to happen and from a physical standpoint it is very difficult to plan unless it is <br />known what will happen to the majority of the property. <br />Ms. Maas asked who will decided whether these are considered housing units or not? <br />Mr. Iserson said it is the City Council's decision with input from the Planning Commission. <br />Ms. Maas said if these units are not considered housing units then they do not apply to the <br />goals that are to be met under the Housing Element. <br />Mr. Iserson said staff would work with the developer and the County to try to get some <br />affordability into the project. It would not have to follow the inclusionary zoning ordinance, but the <br />Housing Element has identified 79 affordable housing units on this site. It is the city's position to use <br />any opportunity possible to find affordable units for seniors. <br />Ms. Maas said if these were considered as housing units then it would apply to the housing cap <br />and would be in competition with other units in the city. <br />Mr. Iserson said that was correct. <br />Jerry Thorne felt this project seemed isolated and wondered if thought had been given to how to <br />evacuate this many seniors in the event of an emergency. He wanted to see a specific plan prepared. <br />Mr. Cook said if there were some kind of disaster, he felt the problem would not be getting <br />people out, but rather keeping others from coming in because this facility is so well built and well <br />Joint Workshop <br />City CounciVPlanning Commission 4 10/11/05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.