My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101105
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN101105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:42 AM
Creation date
10/14/2005 10:07:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/11/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN101105
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />would solve many problems and would allow businesses with access along EI Charro. She would like <br />a nice entrance to Pleasanton at the exit from 1-580 to EI Charro. There have been many problems <br />with Santa Rita Road and how it looks. She agreed with the Hendrick Group moving to that site and <br />did not want to lose them. She said this is not a company that puts up big gorilla balloons. The auto <br />mall on the Pleasanton side of the freeway has always look distinguished as compared to that across <br />the freeway. The continuing care facility is a different animal and she did not feel people were looking <br />at in that way. She knows people in Pleasanton who are putting the same kind of payment down on <br />facilities out of state. People who own houses in the Pleasanton area have no place to go. They go to <br />the mountains or move elsewhere. She did not see how affordability could be integrated into this <br />development because it is not that kind of project. It would be nice to keep seniors in the city. This is <br />independent living that can move to assisted then skilled care. This is a wonderful thing to have close <br />by. She was uncertain how to deal with the housing cap. <br /> Philip Blank liked the idea of rotating the park. There may be other options to the Stoneridge <br />Drive question, such as "de-aligning" the road from Jack London or putting structures in the way without <br />having to go through an EIR. He was concerned about the proximity to the airport and the noise. He <br />strongly encouraged the developers to work with the airport officials. He also felt there should be <br />substantial noise attenuation incorporated into the design of the facility. <br /> Ann Fox supported the senior facility, but had concerns about the EVA. She wanted it to be <br />similar to the one between Martin Avenue and Dennis Drive. That is not paved like a road, but instead <br />a vehicle would have to drive over a curb onto something that looks like a sidewalk. It does not look <br />like a road extension. She wanted assurances that if there is commercial use on the five acres on the <br />plan that there be no parking lot in the middle, where a person could cut through a parking lot in order <br />to get from one side to the other. She referred to the necessary 50% presale of units before this project <br />could go forward. She wanted to make certain there is a disclosure about the airport to potential <br />buyers. She also wanted a berm at 1-580 to reduce the noise and a buffer area of green space <br />between the auto mall and the continuing care community similar to the buffer zone along Martin <br />Avenue that buffers residents from the quarry area by 50 feet. She wanted to make certain the light <br />and glare would be mitigated from the mall for the senior facility. She referred to the existing west side <br />community parks of Muirwood and Val Vista and the discussion to reduce the size of the Staples park <br />based on the larger size of the Bernal Park. She would like staff to review acreage in community parks <br />on the west side compared to the east side and think about whether it would make sense to reorient it <br />vertically or to make it 22 acres. She wanted to look at the desired amenities for this facility because <br />when the community park was originally proposed, this type of configuration was not envisioned. She <br />felt it may make sense to make it larger. She also wanted some guarantee that if the EVA ever <br />becomes more than an EVA, that the community would have an opportunity to referend that. The <br />decision should be by rezoning instead of conditional use permit. <br /> Jennifer Pearce said members of the Planning Commission had made a lot of good points. She <br />agreed with shifting the park by 90 degrees because it gives the seniors better access to the park <br />because they don't have to cross what could be a major thoroughfare. It also gives existing residents <br />peace of mind concerning the EVA possibly becoming a major thoroughfare. It gives good access to <br />the businesses from EI Charro. She agreed with Ms. Roberts that this continuing care facility is a <br />different animal but she would like to find some way to make it more affordable. <br />Joint Workshop <br />City CounciVPlanning Commission 11 1 0/11 /05 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.