CCMIN083005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Eric Otis Nostrand, 3015 Hopyard Road, said he cuts through town to get to Stoneridge Mall and other places. Part of the reason we are in the traffic predicament is because Pleasanton is at the junction of two major freeways and many are viewing that as a bad thing. However, because of that position Pleasanton has a thriving business community. There is a wonderful mall at that intersection, a great business park that creates a tax revenue that allows us to have the city we all enjoy, and perhaps traffic is the price we pay for all this. He believed we should consider the glass half full and not half empty. He did have a few concerns. One was that all scenarios seemed to be looking at existing plus approved development and not planned development for the future, especially with regard to business. Consideration needs to be given to the build out of Stone ridge Mall and Hacienda Business Park. That new businesses will provide the tax base for many services in Pleasanton and if there is no consideration of the impacts of traffic, he wondered what fiscal impact will there be without the new business? He believed Highway 84 improvements should be a top priority and would give the most benefit for the investment. He objected to eliminating any possibilities from the General Plan, even though they may not be built in the foreseeable future. He supported the Stone ridge Drive extension for reasons already stated. He noted previous comments about "those people" in Dublin or Livermore coming through Pleasanton and said many of those people work for him and cannot afford to live in Pleasanton. He cited other examples of people from those communities and their connections to Pleasanton. Alternative A seems to include many traffic signals. He believed Valley Avenue and Bernal Avenue were to be a ring road to get people around town, but there are about thirty signals on that road and that does not seem like the way it should work. He also opposed roundabouts for various reasons. Gail Gilpin, 688 Windmill Lane, said when she moved here she saw a community of people, not just Pleasanton, Dublin and Livermore. She felt cut-through traffic had become a very ugly phrase. When people from across Bernal drove through her neighborhood to take their children to school, she did not consider that cut-through traffic. It was a neighbor taking a child to school. But now, years later, when she wants to drive through their neighborhood to Raley's, she can't do it at certain hours because she was considered cut-through traffic. She felt it was being divisive when it gets to that level. She encouraged people to remember this is a friendly community and we are not each other's enemies. Mayor Hosterman thanked all those who attended the meeting and expressed their views. She invited the commissioners to comment on the three Alternatives proposed. There was a break at 9:20 p.m. The workshop reconvened at 9:30 p.m. 4. NEXT STEPS AND MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL OR COMMISSION Commissioner Ann Fox commented about the definitions of cut-through traffic and suggested they be more in line with the Livermore definitions in terms of regional cut-through and combining citywide arterial and neighborhood into local cut-through traffic. She wanted to review some of the objectives in the Circulation Element of Livermore, such as "minimize adverse impacts of regional cut- through traffic." She cited some of their policies, such as ''the city shall recognize that increasing capacity on streets leading to 1-580 would increase regional cut-through traffic" and "the city shall not base roadway system improvements solely on the local effects or the impacts of the improvement of regional cut-through traffic." She also felt there seems to be issues whether cut-through traffic, regional Joint Workshop City Council/Planning Commission 12 08/30/05