Laserfiche WebLink
<br />one-story building and there are thoughts to possibly expand this building. He suggested <br />Council consider this building in terms of providing second story housing in the Downtown. <br />Ms. McGovern asked if the PDA supported the idea of second-story housing above <br />commercial buildings? <br />Mr. Huff said yes. <br />Mr. Brozosky asked how the idea of second-story housing above commercial buildings <br />tied in with the General Plan process. <br />Jerry Iserson, Director of Planning and Community Development, believed staff would <br />address the issue and question of the Downtown land use because it had been approached in <br />the Downtown Specific Plan. The Downtown Specific Plan includes language that directs staff <br />to look at the residential areas and development standards that make sense for areas on <br />Second Street and other areas where people want to expand and make the older homes fit with <br />the new life style of families today. The previous Council directed staff to address the question <br />of second units in the Downtown, which is included in its work plan. The original proposal for <br />the Tully's building did propose apartments over the retail business. He could not recall if <br />opposition came from the PDA; however, some of the adjacent tenants and property owners <br />had concerns about it and the parking impacts so the applicant changed the proposal to office in <br />order to facilitate the process. <br />Ms. McGovern noted that Council and staff needed to be mindful that parking continues <br />to be a problem and a concern for the Downtown. <br />Mr. Iserson said staff would be addressing the issue of protecting the southeast area of <br />Pleasanton when it began the land use component of the General Plan update. <br />Debi Frost, a Plesanton resident, expressed the importance and the need for a plan for <br />the southern hills of Pleasanton. For the past several years, it has been an uncertain time for <br />the residents of Bridle Creek and many of the residents were mislead by Greenbriar regarding <br />the hills behind Bridle Creek. At the time, Greenbriar did not disclose to the Bridle Creek <br />homeowners that it was the actual property owners of Lund Ranch II that had intentions of <br />building anywhere from 130 to 180 homes in the hills. Greenbriar also neglected to inform <br />Bridle Creek homeowners that the only access to and from the hills would be through the streets <br />of Bridle Creek. Many of the Bridle Creek homeowners prefer that there never be building in the <br />hills but if not possible, the homeowners urge Council to preserve them as much as possible. <br />She was certain that if there were a logical plan proposed by the City that allowed for an <br />abundance of open space, limited the number of homes and compensated fairly the <br />landowners, the people of Bridle Creek would be receptive to such a plan. <br />Greg O'Connor, a Pleasanton resident, expressed his concern about the hills in <br />southeast Pleasanton, particularly as the City is approaching the voter approved housing cap. <br />He believed there is sufficient amount of space within the flatlands where housing is proposed in <br />the General Plan that would be more suitable for housing. He was concerned about the lack of <br />affordable and senior housing as the City's approaches build out. He urged Council to preserve <br />the remaining hills with open space and set it as a priority. <br />Mike Regan, a Pleasanton resident, asked Council to consider prioritizing a plan for the <br />south Pleasanton hills. The projects proposed are on a large scale in a fairly pristine area and <br />City Council Priorities Workshop 2 08/23/05 <br />Minutes <br />