CCMIN071905 - Laserfiche WebLink

Peter Milliken, a Valley Trails resident, mentioned that his home is approximately 50 yards from St. Clare's. He asked Council to make amendments to what has already been done and noted that he had not been invited to attend any of the neighborhood meetings. He asked Council to consider the removal of the wooden fence, as he did not want to look at a wooden fence filled with graffiti. He noted that St. Clare's has been a good neighbor; however, he objected to the expansion of the existing parking lot and the driveway coming in from National Park Drive and urged Council to address these issues. He was not opposed to the cyclone fence, a~ the noise i~ not a problem. Ted Crowton, a Pleasanton resident, took exception to the closing statement made by a representative from St. Clare's at the May 11, 2005 meeting where it was mentioned that a study was done that indicated adjacent housing values would not be impacted by the expansion and additional parking spaces. He believed the study was arbitrary without factual merit, structure and documentation and is of no value in this matter. He noted that St. Clare's sold 44,580 square feet of its property to the Masonic Lodge which included 207 feet equaling 67 percent of its prime frontage on Hopyard Road that would have provided it with exposure to Hopyard Road. St. Clare's also entered into a shared parking agreement with the Masonic Lodge. The additional parking lot should not be allowed in the northern portion of St. Clare's property fronting onto National Park Road for three reasonS: (1) it is too inviting to mandate or ask to be granted a variance for a driveway onto National Park Road; (2) the parking lot is located next to Valley Trails Park and the project subverts the purpose of existence of the parkland for its own use at the expense of the citizenry; and (3) the Masonic Lodge holds meetings and social events or rents out its facility for special events with open bar and St. Clare's parking lot then becomes a bar parking lot and should not be fronted on a residential street. All future parking should be located on the Masonic property as close to the Masonic Hall as possible for easy access and safety of the Mason members, its guests and the Valley Trails neighbors. The Masonic Lodge property can accommodate more than the additional 42 parking spaces for the total of 104 that St. Clare's proposed. The Pleasanton Fire Department would still have the same access and firefighting capabilities that it currently has with the additional parking being located next to the Masonic Lodge. St. Clare's and the Masonic Lodge chose to locate its businesses together and in doing so, initiated how it could expand its customer base. He believed the build out of St. Clare's would be detrimental to the Valley Trails residents' quality of life and property values. Dave Pastor, a Pleasanton resident, noted that he attended the February 8, 2005 Valley Trails Homeowners Association meeting. He opposed the expansion of the existing parking lot and wondered if the expansion not only benefited St. Clare's, but also added parking spaces for the Masonic Lodge. He agreed that St. Clare's needed to expand, but wondered if the plans have allowed for over-expansion. The expansion of the existing parking lot would not benefit the Valley Trails neighborhood. William Hecht, a Valley Treils resident, did not have any problems with St. Clare's expanding, if Council chose to approve Option 3 as referenced in the staff report, he would like included in this option that there is absolutely no chance of having a driveway onto National Park Drive due to the traffic. He asked if the seating capacity for the Masonic Lodge property had been considered? He believed adequate parking needed to accommodate both buildings as they share a parking lot. Connie Cox, President of the Valley Treils Homeowners Association, summarized the key points. She noted that no one is opposed to St. Clare's expanding; however, the Valley Trails neighbors want to be heard and the issues need to be addressed. She did not believe that the two meetings sponsored by the City were adequate enough for this type of project. She Pleasanton City Council 12 07/19/05 Minutes