My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060805
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN060805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
6/16/2005 4:09:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/8/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060805
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
aside so the City does not have huge spikes similar to what it has incurred recently. In <br />the current year, the last posting year-to-date was approximately 10%. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho believed it was aggressive and that the City has no indication of what <br />will happen in terms of what PERS investment retums will be. In the long-term, he <br />believed the City should fund the normal cost, and historically the City has not. Moving <br />forward, the f{nanclal strategy is to set that money aside ~0 when there are peak~, the <br />City could dip into its reserve to pay the ongoing liability costs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky questioned the funding of the retirement plan, as he believed the <br />City's retirement plan was fully funded. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho briefly explained the three different retirement plans the City has with <br />PERS. The performance is specific to each of those plans and depending on the assets <br />each plan has and how it gets addressed is how PERS bases its rates for each agency. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi stated that PERS has divided smaller groups and combined them into <br />larger like groups to help smooth out some of the ups and downs. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky questioned the medical expenses and what pementage was for <br />current employees and what percentage was for retirees. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi did not have the information available at the meeting. She said it <br />would need to be calculated. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky indicated he would be interested in receiving that information. <br /> Mr. Sullivan inquired about the restructuring of local governments. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi stated in general, there have been many ideas discussed on <br />restructuring local government funding, such as cities competing for sales tax dollars <br />because it is one of a few revenue soumes that can be controlled. She said the State <br />could decide to do something to change that and take sales tax, as we know it away, <br />and because the City has a fairly large pementage of sales tax, it could be adverse to <br />the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan wanted to confirm that this was the State changing the policies we <br /> use to collect revenue. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi provided another example as to how Proposition 13 was implemented. <br /> The City of Pleasanton receives a higher pementage of property tax of 1% dollar than <br /> other cities receive. The City has an above average amount and there is always a <br /> potential for that allocation to be reviewed and brought down to average, which would <br /> adversely impact the City. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan said any drastic restructuring by the State would be by legislation <br /> and not an executive order by the Governor. <br /> <br /> Ms. Rossi said yes. <br /> <br />City Council Workshop <br /> 6 O6/O8/O5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.