My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN052405
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN052405
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
6/16/2005 4:01:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/24/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN052405
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Stern said that when the Housing Element was written, staff added all the <br />potential residential development available and found the figure was short by 800-900 <br />units from the original housing needs figure given by ABAG. Therefore, Program 98.1 <br />was in recognition that the City was short of its supposed need as presented by ABAG <br />and some sites would be redesignated to meet that need. That was a condition of <br />approval for the Housing Element. <br /> <br /> Ms. McGovern felt that there are approved projects that may not be built and she <br />felt the 800-900 units could be included in the 27,315 figure. <br /> <br /> Ms. Stern said about 5,000 units are needed for the ABAG requirement. If staff <br />added the 800 units to 27,315, it would be considered as double counting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Iserson clarified that the number of units to be achieved by rezoning was not <br />based on the existing General Plan. When staff added potential units, existing units and <br />approved but not built units, it was still less than required by ^B^G. So it was <br />necessary to find more acreage to get additional units. <br /> <br /> Michael Roush believed that it is possible some of the units in the 27,315 figure <br />may never be built. The City may rezone property to accommodate the other 815 units, <br />but that does not mean those units will be built either. In order to meet the certification <br />requirements of HCD, the City had to identify the areas where the units could be built. <br />The units may never be built, but it is necessary to show there is land available to <br />satisfy the requirement. There is no guarantee or requirement that the units be built, it <br />is simply that the City has designated that the land is available to meet the fair needs <br />allocation. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman asked if there were any chance the HCD might reconsider <br />recertification in the near future? <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush responded that staff is assembling information for HCD which would <br />give them assurances the City is moving ahead with all due speed to rezone additional <br />property to accommodate the 800 units and to get the Housing Element recertified. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman said it would be good to be in compliance, but asked what <br /> happens if that does not occur? <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said there is no penalty at this point. It is possible some State grants <br /> may not be available to the City. When there is a certified Housing Element, there is a <br /> presumption that the Housing Element is in compliance with the law. If it were not <br /> certified, then if someone were to bring some legal challenge, the City would have to <br /> present evidence that it meets statutory requirements and is legal. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman said from her legal reading, there have been incidents when <br /> cities have been out of compliance and were challenged in court, and the courts found <br /> in favor of the cities. <br /> <br />Joint Workshop <br />City Council and Planning Commission 2 05/24/05 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.