My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060705
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
CCMIN060705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:41 AM
Creation date
6/2/2005 1:26:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/7/2005
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN060705
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Becky Dennis, a Pleasanton resident, expressed her interest in the economic and fiscal <br />analysis as it pertained to agenda item 4t, which she believed hinged on Affordable Housing <br />Week and the Vision Statement for the General Plan update. She was glad to see the City is <br />undertaking a fiscal analysis of the new General Plan. The sustainability aspect of the General <br />Plan Vision is an important analysis as many of the environmental enhancements that the City <br />has implemented over the years were possible only because Pleasanton has financial <br />resources. The City needs to develop a plan for economic stability with input from all of <br />Pleasanton'~ ~takeholdem. Independent, objective analysis is key to the credibility of the Plan <br />to ensure the long-term economic success of this community. She was hopeful that the process <br />of formulating the Plan would eliminate the war that exists between Pleasanton's residential and <br />its commemial stakeholders. As the City approaches residential build out, maintaining <br />Pleasanton, as an attractive location for business investment is key to minimizing the future <br />costs to residential property owners in sustaining the quality of life. Residents must define the <br />acceptable level of impact from increased business activity or alternatively, plan to shoulder the <br />increased financial burden of foregoing economic growth. The community should be able to <br />look to Bay Area economics for accurate analysis that will result in a plan that is both <br />economically and politically realistic. Pleasanton did this on a small scale with the Vineyard <br />Corridor Specific Plan, which proved acceptable and beneficial to all of the stakeholders. <br />During this analysis, she asked Council to consider Pleasanton's investment in affordable work <br />force housing as a tool for business attraction and retention. Pleasanton has adequate <br />infrastructure to support a high quality of life for its young families and many more parents work <br />in Pleasanton than can afford to live in our community. For too many large employers, a <br />decision to leave Pleasanton for a less expensive location would only put them closer to their <br />own employees in addition to lowering facilities costs. Council should also consider how much <br />more Pleasanton's businesses would be involved in supporting schools and community <br />enhancements if more of its employees lived in this community. A greater commitment of <br />Pleasanton's resoumes to the creation of affordable work force housing will help the City remain <br />competitive as a business location in tough economic times and it will reduce environmental <br />impacts within this community and the City may grow economically while retaining the ~small <br />town" feeling when residents spend more than 25 percent of their time commuting. She <br />encouraged Council to involve residential property owners from different areas in the community <br />during this process and analysis so that they and their neighbors clearly understand the long <br />term costs of maintaining their property values and their quality of life, and how these costs <br />could be minimized through policies that support commemial growth and how impacts of growth <br />can be minimized through planning. <br /> <br /> In response to an inquiry by Ms. McGovern, Mr. Fialho said the City has approximately <br /> six to eight million dollars in reserve that is undedicated for affordable housing opportunities. As <br /> part of the Council's priorities for the current year, Council authorized staff to prepare a plan on <br /> how this revenue is strategically used to maximize affordable housing opportunities throughout <br /> the community. Staff anticipates returning to Council with this plan in the fall. <br /> <br /> Mr. Sullivan pointed out that one of the programs the City has available that enhance <br /> affordable housing is a solar affordable housing program that was enacted by Grid Alternatives <br /> with the assistance of block grants from the Pleasanton Community Development Funds. The <br /> first series of solar installations would be conducted later this month and he believed a <br /> celebration would be appropriate. <br /> <br /> Mr. Brozosky asked staff to provide a brief background as it related to agenda item 4p, <br /> quitclaim to the City of Dublin property adjacent to Tassajara Road. <br /> <br /> Mr. Fialho said in the mid to late '80's, the City made several improvements to the <br /> interchanges along 1-580 in recognition of Hacienda Business Park, which included the <br /> <br /> Pleasanton City Council 2 06/07/05 <br /> Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.