CCMIN020805 - Laserfiche WebLink

Drive is not a good idea; Compassion - what haplSened to the allegiance to the existing Koffinger Ranch homeowners' expectations of a quiet and safe environment in which to raise a family; Self-Discipline - Kottinger Ranch was appropriately planned years ago and the expectations of the homeowners should be preserved; Honesty - Kottinger Ranch homeowners were given an expectation and should continue to live in a safe and quiet neighborhood; Respect - the Kottinger Ranch homeowners should be treated with respect as they make decisions for future generations; Integrity - this is instilled in the children and the adults should also keep this in mind and preserve the open space and maintain the quiet neighborhood. She urged Council not to approve an additional 98 homes in a beautiful, quiet and safe area. Scott Walsh, 2376 Greenberry Court, said he remembered when Kottinger Ranch was really a ranch. He originally supported the Kottinger Ranch development. He asked about the costs to the community for park maintenance or open space management. He is a fire captain and was naturally concerned about fire safety. He felt the proposed homes in the area should be fire sprinkle red. He watched Kottinger Ranch being constructed and acknowledged the high cost of the homes. He felt the value of the existing homes would be enhanced by the new construction and wanted to see if the EIR could address the economic positive for the area. Dawn DeMarcus, 426 Amaral Circle, said she grew up in Pleasanton and if earlier residents had insisted on preserving open space and denying new development most of the speakers in the chambers would not be living her~ now. She wanted to keep that in perspective and felt there was always a balance and trade-off for any project. She hoped people would keep an open mind. She commented it is difficult to use Pleasanton Ridge at times and she felt this was an opportunity to preserve the natural integrity of the hills. Otherwise there are only urban parks with grass and paved walkways. She believed traffic was not just a problem for a specific development, but.rather an entire city problem. Mike Regan, 1363 Hearst Drive, said he has been participating with regard to development proposals the southeast Pleasanton hills for about a year and a half. He wanted the EIR process to be broad in scope in terms of the overall General Plan for Pleasanton. He did not want it to just look at what happens if you take two trees out in one place and replace them in another. He felt there was a significant impact by this project on the community. He believed the extension of Hearst Drive would not only add traffic as a result of additional cars from the Kottinger Hills, but would also encourage development of county land beyond the urban growth boundary. Some things he was uncertain how to measure, such as quality of life in a neighborhood. Kottinger Ranch is an active and close-knit community. He said the open space and pristine hills were a great benefit that needs to be cherished and preserved. He was concerned about impacts on the wildlife and the watershed. Grazing land is diminishing and he was also concerned about erosion from the grading. Wild fires are of concern as well. He noted 122 trees would be removed, but asked how many would be impacted from changes in runoff from landscaped yards. He wanted to contain urban sprawl and expressed concerns about traffic. If more entrances and exits are provided to a neighborhood, it presents opportunities for cut through-traffic. Dolores Bengtson, 568 Hamilton Way, had to leave before her name was called, but left a note saying she was in favor of proceeding with the EIR process. Joint Workshop City Council and Planning Commission 6 02/08/05