CCMIN031505 - Laserfiche WebLink

eyesore. He was opposed to the proposed option to locate the bypass road in a different location other than what was mentioned in the Specific Plan. He was also opposed to the proposed 79-unit development plan, as the rural atmosphere would be lost. Vanessa Kawaihau, a Happy Valley resident, spoke in opposition to the proposed alternative to locate the bypass read to a location that is different than shown in the Happy Valley Specific Plan. In January 2004, she asked the previous Council at what point would it cease authorizing additional funding for the golf course. She inquired about the reimbursement for the 10 City of Pleasanton lots. She asked how much the City is anticipating recovering from the Happy Valley residents for the non $5.5.million dollars of City infrastructure costs? She pointed out that the Spotomo medium density PUD was expected to use the North Sycamore Specific Plan area infrastructure, which is no longer the case. She asked if increasing the Spotorno flat land density from 16 to 79 units or more would reduce the Happy Valley residents costs, or would these residents need to pick up some of the costs? She reminded Council of the half a million-dollar triple flip transfer last year from the In Lieu Park Dedication Fee fund to the General Fund to the Bypass Reserve fund. She pointed out that nowhere in the staff report is there a line item consideration for additional funds from the current developers. She asked Council if the $5 million dollar temporary loan from the Water Fund would cover the expenses for the water that is needed to seed the golf course, and to pay the bond debt? She pointed out that consideration was not given to the condition for the endowment fund for maintenance of the golf course portion of the open space area. Kevin Close, a Happy Valley resident, noted that the Alviso Adobe Community Park project funds are short. He asked if the $1.2 million dollars in Capital Improvement Program (CIP) reserves that is needed for additional work at the golf course would affect all of the CIP projects? He urged Council to honor its commitment to the community and locate the bypass road as mentioned in the Happy Valley Specific Plan. Jerry Wagner, a Happy Valley resident, expressed his opposition to the costs associated with the Callippe Preserve Golf Course and alternatives for the bypass read. Written communication was provided by Daryl Horan and Julia and Mike Sanderson, Happy Valley residents, informing Council how negatively the proposed bypass read will impact the environment and their way of life. Mayor Hosterman closed the public comments. In response to an inquiry by Mr. Brozosky, Mr. Roush said the 34 residential lots are not part of the equation and the cost of the bypass road will be split between the Spotorno development and the City. Mr. Brozosky asked if bicycles would be allowed on the open space trail? Mr. Wilson said no. In response to an inquiry by Mr. Brozosky, Mr. Roush said that in order to properly assess the environmental impact there will need to be some fiscal analysis conducted as there will need to be some order of magnitude of what will need to occur in order to build the bypass read. Pleasanton City Council 22 03/15/05 Minutes