Laserfiche WebLink
problems that are associated with having a parking lot relatively near to both an <br />elementary and middle school. <br /> <br /> Susan Gold, a Pleasanton resident, spoke in strong opposition to relocating the <br />ACE Train Station behind the elementary and middle schools for the same reasons as <br />the previous speaker indicated. <br /> <br /> Pamm Ambrose, a Walnut Hills resident, spoke in strong opposition to relocating <br />the ACE Train Station behind the elementary and middle schools. She noted that this <br />would create a dangerous situation by placing vehicular and adult traffic that close to an <br />elementary and middle school. If the train station were relocated to the Bernal Property, <br />it would be accessible for children to play on the train tracks. As a homeowner, she <br />believed the cultural arts center/amphitheater belongs on the south side of the Bemal <br />Property. <br /> <br /> Bernard Cheng, a Walnut Hills resident, opposed the location of the cultural arts <br />center/amphitheater at the Bernal Avenue site, as it would significantly add to the <br />amplified noise that is already generated by the concerts held at the Fairgrounds. <br /> <br /> Steven Klinger, a Walnut Hills resident, was surprised to learn about an outdoor <br />amphitheater with amplified music. He believed that a community park with a music <br />facility should be a free, community and family-oriented music venue, more in line with <br />the bandstand that is on First Street, rather than a revenue-generating venue that has <br />amplified music. He did not believe this was in keeping with the character of <br />Pleasanton. He referred to the disclosure statement that he studied before he and his <br />family purchased their home in the Walnut Hills development. The disclosure statement <br />only mentioned the noise generated by Bernal Avenue and how that necessitated <br />upgrading the windows on the houses that were directly adjacent to Bernal Avenue. As a <br />resident of Walnut Hills, he did not believe this community was designed to take an <br />audio assault of the magnitude that is described in the staff report for the five site plan <br />alternatives. He would prefer to have the cultural arts/amphitheater located at the south <br />site of Valley Avenue and to have non-amplified music. He pointed out that the streets <br />in the Walnut Hills development ara narrower than standard streets. The setbacks for <br />the homes are reduced from what is typical, and the residents would feel any additional <br />congestion in this neighborhood. <br /> <br /> Mayor Hosterman reminded the public that this process has been ongoing for a <br />number of years even before the Walnut Hills development was built and occupied. She <br />believed Council needed to do a better job of reaching out to the existing community, but <br />also to the new community and neighbors. <br /> <br /> Erin Bringhurst, a Walnut Hills resident, was concerned about locating the <br />cultural arts/amphitheater facility so close to the homes not only because of the amplified <br />noise but also because of the parking issues and the lights generated from the parking <br />lots that will shine into the neighboring residents windows. He noted that the <br />neighboring community or the sports park would absorb any overflow parking. The idea <br />to provide for pedestrian traffic in the center of Pleasanton to the cultural <br />arts/amphitheater facility is ideal, but he believed it would not work as it is too far. He <br />noted that Pleasanton is running out of open space and having a sense of open space to <br />balance out the remainder of the usable space in Pleasanton is the ideal that makes this <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 6 02/01/05 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />