My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN080304
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CCMIN080304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/17/2007 10:56:40 AM
Creation date
10/21/2004 1:09:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/3/2004
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN080304
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the potential school, it commissioned a study to be done as the asphalt batch plant fell <br />within the setback of the potential school. It has been determined that the air quality <br />standards are met by Granite Constrqction's operation. The School District is <br />comfortable with the report, but it is concerned about the future operation of the plant and <br />how its capacities may change .or ho~v it.s ope. ration may chan. ge. When the School <br />District Board of Trustees considered th~s at ~ts June ~, meeting, the Board accepted the <br />report but did ask that the item be continued for further discussion. She said that she will <br />attend the Alameda County Planning[ Commission meeting on behalf of the School <br />District, and the Board will continue ito consider the additional potential effects of the <br />plant. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the Schoo! District was ever notified that the asphalt batch <br />plant was going to locate on its current site? <br /> <br />Ms. Lemmons said that the S~hool District was not informed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if Granite Construction Company was doing the rubberized <br />process at the time the School Distriet conducted its study? <br /> <br /> Ms. Lemmons said that the c~nsultant who conducted the air quality study did <br />take the rubberized process into consideration. <br /> <br /> Mayor Pico asked if School I)istrict representatives have met with Granite <br />Construction Company? <br /> <br /> Ms. Lemmons said that the School District has had discussions with Granite <br />Conslruction Company and has shared information. The School District will continue <br />this dialogue. <br /> <br /> Mr. Campbell was curious abOut the tone of the discussion with Granite <br />Construction Company. <br /> <br /> Ms. Lemmons said that Granite Construction Company has been very <br />cooperative. <br /> <br /> Joshua Brysk, a Pleasanton resident, commended staff for its report, as it was very <br />concise and full of information. If the proposed letter were sent, he believed it would <br />begin a process at Alameda County that will provide Granite Construction Company the <br />opportunity to address ail of the issues, and provide the public the opportunity to bring <br />forward its concerns and issues. He Was surprised that Granite Construction Company <br />was not aware of any complaints when the staff report seemed to indicate that there are a <br />large number of documented complaints. While the public may not be calling Granite <br />Construction Company to complain, lthere are certainly complaints. He believed the real <br />issue is that the residents will end up with a facility that has not had an environmental <br />review yet be within 1000 feet of the school. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 8 08/03/04 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.